105
edits
Talk:Legendary duo: Difference between revisions
→Mewtwo and Mew, a duo?: new section
Saiph charon (talk | contribs) (→SeaFairy duo: new section) |
(→Mewtwo and Mew, a duo?: new section) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Phione is the naturaly created (bred) weaker version of Manaphy. | Phione is the naturaly created (bred) weaker version of Manaphy. | ||
The first are both Psychic the latter are both Water... There is no logic saying one are a duo and the other 2 are not.--[[User:Saiph charon|Saiph charon]] 12:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC) | The first are both Psychic the latter are both Water... There is no logic saying one are a duo and the other 2 are not.--[[User:Saiph charon|Saiph charon]] 12:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Mewtwo and Mew, a duo? == | |||
It is a bit of an stretch, the only relation they have is flavor text: They lack similar stat distributions or even stat totals and they have different movesets and learning levels. When they were made, they were not paired like the other 3 duos, and rather worked like two related but standalone Pokemon. You can see it in gen II, when they diverge, and Mewtwo inspires Lugia and Ho-Oh, while Mew inspires Celebi (and the future event Pokemon). | |||
Yeah, Mewtwo and Mew are related, but it is not the same relation that the other 3 examples have. In fact, Mewtwo, apart of flavor text, has more things with common with the Tower Duo that with Mew; with whom it only has in common Flavor text. | |||
So, this is at least worth of a mention in the article. An article, I have to say, way less solid that the Legendary trio one, and based quite a bit more that it in fan theories. [[User:Eriorguez|Eriorguez]] 17:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | |||