6,586
edits
User talk:Missingno. Master/Archive13: Difference between revisions
User talk:Missingno. Master/Archive13 (view source)
Revision as of 11:28, 28 August 2010
, 28 August 2010→TCG images being JPG
(→TCG images being JPG: new section) |
|||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Most cards are saved in JPG format. Its just how they are. Why did you mark so many with unsatisfactory due to "its a JPG"? If the scan itself is bad, then that is another thing, but you can't say they are bad just because they are JPG. Most of them were reverted, but a few haven't been. You should go back and fix your mistake. Thanks, <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Blake|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>[[User talk:Blake#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Blake|Edits]]</sup> 03:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | Most cards are saved in JPG format. Its just how they are. Why did you mark so many with unsatisfactory due to "its a JPG"? If the scan itself is bad, then that is another thing, but you can't say they are bad just because they are JPG. Most of them were reverted, but a few haven't been. You should go back and fix your mistake. Thanks, <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Blake|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>[[User talk:Blake#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Blake|Edits]]</sup> 03:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:That was actually covered in the section right above this one. As I said there, I was under the impression that JPGs were considered to be bad pictures all around for the purposes of Bulbapedia, and so I just slapped bad picture notices on any article that had a JPG. I imagine that the ones that haven't been reverted really are bad. <small>- ''unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])'' </small> 11:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | |||