4
edits
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Come on, Nintendo's not gonna make a Pokemon based on a FETUS. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 15:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | :Come on, Nintendo's not gonna make a Pokemon based on a FETUS. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 15:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Er, ah....yes. I think it should be changed to "oval" or "ovaloid". I can guess I used the word incorrectly in the description, now. [[User:Steph|Steph]] 15:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | ::Er, ah....yes. I think it should be changed to "oval" or "ovaloid". I can guess I used the word incorrectly in the description, now. [[User:Steph|Steph]] 15:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I bet you it really is based on a fetus, or some part of the birthing process. Ovular would actually seem the more | |||
::I bet you it really is based on a fetus, or some part of the birthing process. Ovular would actually seem the more correct to me. [[User:Ph4mp573r|Ph4mp573r]] 20:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
If I understand correctly, mew is a fetus, there's a few clues that point towards that origin. | If I understand correctly, mew is a fetus, there's a few clues that point towards that origin. |
edits