283
edits
Talk:Zoroark (Pokémon)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→i have an issue
| Line 223: | Line 223: | ||
::::::But anyway, I wasn't saying that Pokemon are ''never'' based on European myths; that would be just ignorant. XD My point was that if a Pokemon is significantly similar to a well-known Japanese mythological figure, but is also slightly similar to some western myth... chances are high that the true origin is the Japanese one. :P <span style="border: 2px dotted #FFBBDD;">[[User:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;">梅子</span>]][[User talk:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sup>❀</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sub>✿</sub></span>]]</span> 14:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | ::::::But anyway, I wasn't saying that Pokemon are ''never'' based on European myths; that would be just ignorant. XD My point was that if a Pokemon is significantly similar to a well-known Japanese mythological figure, but is also slightly similar to some western myth... chances are high that the true origin is the Japanese one. :P <span style="border: 2px dotted #FFBBDD;">[[User:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;">梅子</span>]][[User talk:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sup>❀</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sub>✿</sub></span>]]</span> 14:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Even so, but based on the myths, the kitsune was mischievous, not evil like the black fox. (the Dark types japanese name is Evil type) so it is more likely based on the BF. (i am not one to give up easily)[[User:Vkickass|Vkickass]] 06:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | Even so, but based on the myths, the kitsune was mischievous, not evil like the black fox. (the Dark types japanese name is Evil type) so it is more likely based on the BF. (i am not one to give up easily)[[User:Vkickass|Vkickass]] 06:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:That's not much of an argument, snce we dn't know if Zoroark are evil. [[User:Reign|Reign]] 08:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | |||