Page history
9 April 2024
→Trivia
m→Trivia: formatting cleanup
−40
forgot a couple things
m+20
added additional context
m+23
Undo revision 3984909 by Lewtwo (talk) I think this is notable enough, reworded to context (since 100% certainty cannot be guaranteed).
m+584
Don't know if MissingNo. being the only glitch Pokemon to have an intentional depiction by a franchise artist is true, and is pure speculation. Exacerbated by the fact that other staff have drawn glitch-adjacent fanworks before. https://discord.com/channels/202737349996576769/1115868340490096680/1227202209398394962 Said by staff that art on the site must have been designed for official use. https://discord.com/channels/202737349996576769/1115868340490096680/1227203061089435658
m−578
8 April 2024
11 January 2024
2 December 2023
2 November 2023
31 October 2023
→External links: I don't think we need this link anymore
−73
Update links to iiMarckus's site, replaced: http://iimarck.us → https://iimarckus.org (2)
m+8
9 October 2023
3 July 2023
12 February 2023
16 January 2023
27 November 2022
25 November 2022
7 November 2022
23 September 2022
10 April 2022
14 December 2021
9 November 2020
24 October 2020
23 October 2020
25 August 2020
4 June 2020
30 May 2020
31 July 2019
2 June 2019
4 May 2019
6 April 2019
26 March 2019
1 March 2019
3 January 2019
11 May 2018
14 July 2017
3 March 2017
→Trivia: If a glitch Pokemon merely has more/less of something than all legitimate Pokemon, but not the most/least of all including glitches, I don't consider that notable.
−431
→Trivia: I guess that this should be removed as it isn't the highest overall for the first point nor the lowest for the second. Though, I guess that they are technically the lowest in speed for the third.
−504