18 September 2019
9 June 2019
16 May 2019
4 October 2018
19 November 2017
8 January 2017
...Wow, I'm embarrassed now. I didn't even remember ever trying to remove it. Maybe this will help stop me if I forget again before the next time it pops up on my watchlist.
Undo revision 2578265 by Pumpkinking0192 (talk)You've already attempted to remove this and I've already given you a reason why it's staying.
Unnecessary, obvious, and a bit speculative (who's to say Game Freak will ever do cross-gen evolutions again? aside from special gimmicks like Alola Forms and Sylveon to introduce the Fairy type, they haven't done any in about a decade).
Since Cosmog line can evolve, better to include Legendary and Mythical Pokémon that don't evolvem
7 January 2017
As we don't currently include Phione, the guardian deities, and the UBs as Legendary or Mythical, they should be included on the page
19 December 2016
Undo revision 2563933 by JewelSatellite (talk) I'm fairly suspicious this user is counting the Tapus as Legendaries, which makes these counts incorrect.
Updated the trivia for Generation VII.m
5 December 2016
28 November 2016
→List of Pokémon that are not part of an evolutionary line: Not sure if the Ultra Beasts should be added
16 October 2016
→Trivia: Be very careful with this wording — Generation III introduced 135 Pokemon, but it included 386. There's a difference.
no edit summary
17 September 2016
No. Keep it unhidden.
Still poorly written. ||| If the only reason it's here is to deter people from adding Megas, it should be in <!-- --> like all the other notes across Bulbapedia to tell people not to add things.
Undo revision 2504589 by Pumpkinking0192 (talk)1) Regardless, this is still a possibility. 2)This is needed for those that try to remove those with Mega Evolutions
→Intro: Speculation; at this point, unless Gen VII throws a curveball, it looks like Game Freak has largely abandoned the concept of cross-generational relatives since Gen IV. ||| This Mega paragraph is poorly written and unnecessary.
14 September 2016
24 July 2016
21 June 2016
28 May 2016
18 February 2016
→Trivia: Bad math. Excluding Legendaries/etc shouldn't mean you still divide by 721. That's just counting them as a separate group when they're really a subsetm
Undo revision 2401262 by Francis-Chan (talk) Stated in the intro.m
no edit summarym
17 January 2016
no edit summarym
Or this might just solve it. (AFAIC, "evolutionary relationship" includes breeding)m
Undo revision 2381693 by Slimey01 (talk)Evolution and breeding are two sides of the same coin: "family". At best, this article is misnamedm
Undo revision 2381681 by Tiddlywinks (talk) "Pokémon that do not evolve from or into any Pokémon" -- Phione fits that description so I'm not sure why it shouldn't be mentioned?
Undo revision 2381677 by Sumwun (talk)No, Phione just doesn't fit the criteria for this list in the first place...m
14 November 2015
19 February 2015
12 February 2015
1 February 2015
SnorlaxMonster moved page List of stand alone Pokémon to List of Pokémon that are not part of an evolutionary line over redirect: Less clear titlem
Swampertguy moved page List of Pokémon that are not part of an evolutionary line to List of stand alone Pokémon: All stand alone Pokémon are the Pokémon that don't evolvem