Open main menu

Bulbapedia β

Bulbapedia:Archived nominations for administratorship/Kogoro

< Bulbapedia:Archived nominations for administratorship

Support (15)

  • Support. She has a lot of awesome contributions. Chocolate 21:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. To be honest, I think she would make a perfect admin. ~~Takoto - サソデイ 23:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. A very kind, understanding user. She also knows what she is doing in any situation. Knowing how to take a good scan is a major plus. Very devoted, based on how she has cards from Base Set to Stormfront. A very good user who I think would be a very great help if she had special admin powers. MaverickNate 02:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  • liek this person to be admin...very helpful, good edits...and not to mention, very observant and smart in wiki code...yes, I would know. Hey, I already did not mention the fact that she is very friendly...okay?--Tavisource 08:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. When you check the Recent Changes, I almost always see her name. Θρtιmαtum♏Talk|Links 08:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Agree changed my mind--DCM((Shut the **** upSpy on My Edits))
  • Support Same reasons as stated above. MathijsP 15:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
  • For. Nice job on the Stormfront TCG. It's good to see a user who can get ahold of the pack so quickly, as it just came out. Bulbapedian - Talk 00:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support she's a good user and she's doing something all the time GoldsWigglytuff 15:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support She is a great contributor to the wiki and can spot errors or Vandalism a blink of light, May be harsh, But that is what we need in adminship, A serious, Hard-working Admin. --Force Fire 10:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Support I haven't been on Bulbapedia for half a year yet and I can still see that Kogoro is an example of the best kind of user. Plus, I get a warm fuzzy feeling nominating people since I'd like to be an adimin somebday. LordArceus 19:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Agree Once again, all of the above--The Kkllnnator blastoise 20:45, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Agree. Level-headed, and has been helping to revert vandals at odd times of day already... giving her admin tools could only help in that regard. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 12:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Agree. She's a lot nicer than some people around here *cough*. Sorry I wasn't at the 'pedia for like a kajillion years. I don't know if we're supposed to change the heading or what, so if it doesn't change itself, I'll have to go change it. --DialgaRULES 23:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. A good user. Receiving forwarded information from when I slept was a plus. Gywall(Talk) 11:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose (6)

  • Disagree. Just because I hate nominations and I prefered the older original way of having to work to greatness.~Ποκεμανιακα0β 23:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. I second that. However, my other reasons are that she only has barely over the minimum edit requirement and has only been actively contributing since October. So, for now, I say no. I think she may make a very good admin at some point in the future. --ニョロトノ666 02:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree Politoed makes a good point there, if Kogoro has only been contributing since October, I don't think there's quite enough experience. Yeah, quality over quantity, but still. The Dark Fiddler - Smarter than the average bear! 16:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree For the same reason stated by Politoed, and The Dark Fiddler. Only one month's worth of contributions is nowhere near enough experience for adminship. Trainer-c 19:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. I agree with all of the above Disagrees. --Gitgo567 08:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree. A little bit strict.-Billy4b2004 10:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Other comments

I think people are missing the point with the whole adminship thing. You nominate a user purely if a situation comes up where it is neccesary to have one, NOT to nominate all the decent users in case something comes up, as that is overkill. Only nominate as it is needed. [/my2cents]Glinn Mgraw 09:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Chocolate clearly stated on Kogoro's talk page that he was just looking for someone to nominate, which definitely isn't how you do it. I'm not going to support or oppose this, and here's why: Kogoro, in terms of card scans, has been an absolutely amazing contributor, and I'm very pleased to see her level of dedication here. However, she's not been here long. So, I won't support or oppose this time, but if a time comes that someone nominates her because they believe she is ready to be an administrator, I will pledge my full support. Cipher (Talk) 10:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually I, believe nominations should no longer take place and the BulbaBoard decides instead.~Ποκεμανιακα0β 02:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Über seconded. --ニョロトノ666 03:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree, however, there may be some users that have had their hopes up to become admins for a long time, and seeing as they were elected puts even more excitement for some. ht14 16:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Thirded. Decisions about user promotions should rest either with the editorial board or with the Bulbapedia administrators, in my opinion. Cipher (Talk) 22:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
This discussion belongs on the Nominations talk page. --Raijinili 08:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)