User talk:Technickal: Difference between revisions

(→‎Eyecatch split: new section)
Line 34: Line 34:


You're right. That was a bad idea. I'll use your suggestions next time. [[User:Technickal|Technickal]] ([[User talk:Technickal|talk]]) 17:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
You're right. That was a bad idea. I'll use your suggestions next time. [[User:Technickal|Technickal]] ([[User talk:Technickal|talk]]) 17:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
== Eyecatch split ==
Hello there, I just noticed you splitted the [[eyecatch]], and while I'm in favor of doing that (I seriously don't get how those two things are related), I believe moving pages are left to staff. This is because other users can only cut-paste the half that'll be split and create a new article (which you did for [[location preview]]), which means that all contributions from other users that were recorded in the history of the article are lost. I ''believe'' it's because of that, but I don't actually know if a staff member can fix that complex problem.
Well, in any case, while that's important, what I really wanted to say is that ''please'' be careful about the original article as well. As you can see in [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Eyecatch&action=history the Eyecatch history], I added new pictures and reorganized the whole anime section a week before you split the pages. However, you didn't catch up on that and deleted all those improvements while spliting the page. I edited the page again, but next time please check any new edits that you didn't copy from a page, before doing a massive change you've prepared beforehand. --[[User:Gabo 2oo|Gabo 2oo]] ([[User talk:Gabo 2oo|talk]]) 04:57, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
2,884

edits