User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/6: Difference between revisions

Line 342: Line 342:


We have small inconsistency on that term. {{p|Lotad}}, {{p|Seedot}} and {{p|Surskit}} are considered to be version-exclusive (though the last one isn't on species page because it's Emerald versus Ruby and Sapphire), but {{p|Regice}} and {{p|Registeel}} aren't. All five require interaction with another game (mixing records or Unova Link). They're linked normally in availability template, but in version-exclusives only the first three are listed, golems aren't. So, what is what? [[User:Marked +-+-+|Marked +-+-+]] ([[User talk:Marked +-+-+|talk]]) 09:16, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
We have small inconsistency on that term. {{p|Lotad}}, {{p|Seedot}} and {{p|Surskit}} are considered to be version-exclusive (though the last one isn't on species page because it's Emerald versus Ruby and Sapphire), but {{p|Regice}} and {{p|Registeel}} aren't. All five require interaction with another game (mixing records or Unova Link). They're linked normally in availability template, but in version-exclusives only the first three are listed, golems aren't. So, what is what? [[User:Marked +-+-+|Marked +-+-+]] ([[User talk:Marked +-+-+|talk]]) 09:16, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
:Based on [[Talk:Version-exclusive Pokémon#Definition of version-exclusive Pokémon|the definition I proposed and wasn't objected to]] two years ago, the golems and Lotad/Seedot/Surskit should be considered version exclusive. I still support this definition. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 06:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)