User talk:Shiningpikablu252: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:


:Even if my sysop powers weren't suspended, your request would still be denied.  "James' Carnivine" would imply a Carnivine implying to a pluralized Jame, which is not the case; "James's Carnivine" correctly implies a Carnivine belonging to a single James.  I don't know which inaccurate textbook you're using, but there is no grammar rule that would allow that page move.  Honestly, people have brought this issue up time and time again and have been turned back every single time...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 20:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
:Even if my sysop powers weren't suspended, your request would still be denied.  "James' Carnivine" would imply a Carnivine implying to a pluralized Jame, which is not the case; "James's Carnivine" correctly implies a Carnivine belonging to a single James.  I don't know which inaccurate textbook you're using, but there is no grammar rule that would allow that page move.  Honestly, people have brought this issue up time and time again and have been turned back every single time...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 20:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
::No, it is not pluralizing James, but it is using college APA English while people on the page's talk page have informed me that this site uses MLA English which apparently allows such usage. [[User:Felinoel|felinoel]] 21:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
613

edits