10
edits
User talk:Pumpkinking0192/Archive 6: Difference between revisions
User talk:Pumpkinking0192/Archive 6 (view source)
Revision as of 03:35, 15 August 2017
, 15 August 2017Signature trouble
(→Attitude: new section) |
(Signature trouble) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Please leave your message by creating a new section below. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 06:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC) | Please leave your message by creating a new section below. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 06:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
== Burmy == | == Burmy == | ||
| Line 358: | Line 355: | ||
Your intention might have been good, but [https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=M09&diff=prev&oldid=2677784 this] is not the best way to address something. I mean generally, yes, the staff have set rules for a reason. However, we have made our fair share of mistakes in the past. If someone reverts one of the staff members, it doesn't always mean that they should be reverted back, which was what I got from "Don't edit war with a staff member. What the staff says goes." in your edit summary. It implied that we don't allow any sort of objection against or discussion with staff, which makes us sound somewhat tyrannical, to be honest. The point is, we want to encourage users to approach us, if they think there is an issue. We appreciate the help, but please try to be more patient and more considerate, when it comes to dealing with other users. [[User:Adil|<span style="color:#009900;">'''Adil'''</span>]] — [[User talk:Adil|<span style="color:#003399;">'''Talk page'''</span>]] 20:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC) | Your intention might have been good, but [https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=M09&diff=prev&oldid=2677784 this] is not the best way to address something. I mean generally, yes, the staff have set rules for a reason. However, we have made our fair share of mistakes in the past. If someone reverts one of the staff members, it doesn't always mean that they should be reverted back, which was what I got from "Don't edit war with a staff member. What the staff says goes." in your edit summary. It implied that we don't allow any sort of objection against or discussion with staff, which makes us sound somewhat tyrannical, to be honest. The point is, we want to encourage users to approach us, if they think there is an issue. We appreciate the help, but please try to be more patient and more considerate, when it comes to dealing with other users. [[User:Adil|<span style="color:#009900;">'''Adil'''</span>]] — [[User talk:Adil|<span style="color:#003399;">'''Talk page'''</span>]] 20:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
== Signature trouble == | |||
Thanks for the signature advice (on the Goodra talk page), Pumpkin. I tried to replace the "unsigned comment" bit with the four tildes like you said, but it didn't work, it returned these two messages at the top. [http://i.imgur.com/tBxO89r.png Screenshot.] It only counts this action as "not vandalism" when I don't remove the "unsigned comment," so, now it's sort of double-signed. Best I can do, sorry. [[User:OrdinaryOddball|OrdinaryOddball]] ([[User talk:OrdinaryOddball|talk]]) 03:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||