User talk:Muk-a-matic: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 160: Line 160:
As it stands for breeding, if the people who created the mechanics of the games had anything to do with the mechanics of the anime, then it would stand to reason that the mechanics would be 1:1. Thus, by this logic, [[Tracey's Marill]], who has a child in [[Misty's Azurill]], would be the female of whichever union created the egg.
As it stands for breeding, if the people who created the mechanics of the games had anything to do with the mechanics of the anime, then it would stand to reason that the mechanics would be 1:1. Thus, by this logic, [[Tracey's Marill]], who has a child in [[Misty's Azurill]], would be the female of whichever union created the egg.


On a tangential note, the above Azurill knows [[Refresh (move)]]. The only way for this Pokémon to learn this move is for it to know it through breeding. In this scenario, the father of the Pokémon must know the move. The only way this could happen in this case is for the father to be a [[Corsola (Pokémon)]], and the only way that this makes sense is for [[Misty's Corsola]] to know Refresh and to be Azurill's father. Of course, said Corsola has never been shown in the anime to know Refresh, so I am speculating, but does that not make sense?
On a tangential note, the above Azurill knows [[Refresh (move)]]. The only way for this Pokémon to learn this move is for it to know it through breeding. In this scenario, the father of the Pokémon must know the move. The only way this could happen in this case is for the father to be a [[Corsola (Pokémon)]], and the only way that this makes sense is for [[Misty's Corsola]] to know Refresh and to be Azurill's father. Of course, said Corsola has never been shown in the anime to know Refresh, so I am speculating, but does that not make sense? [[User:StAugustineVI|StAugustineVI]] ([[User talk:StAugustineVI|talk]]) 23:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)