40,934
edits
User talk:LaprasBoi: Difference between revisions
→Edit summaries
(I do.) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| (30 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*A list of the admins that you can contact if there is a problem can be found [[Special:Listusers/sysop|here]]. | *A list of the admins that you can contact if there is a problem can be found [[Special:Listusers/sysop|here]]. | ||
Thank you, and have a good time editing here! - | Thank you, and have a good time editing here! -WikidSmaht 14:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
==Scathing== | ==Scathing== | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Please, use the preview button rather than making several consecutive edits. --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 21:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | Please, use the preview button rather than making several consecutive edits. --[[Gallade|<span style="color:#00A000;">'''エ'''</span>]][[User:Galladeon|<span style="color:#0000A0;">'''ルレ'''</span>]][[User talk:Galladeon|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''イ'''</span><span style="color:#93abc3;">'''ド'''</span>]] 21:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I do use previews, and also view changes, before submitting( the only time I didn’t recently, due to the fucking session amnesia, [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=PS054&diff=prev&oldid=788819 it bit me in the ass]), so most of my edits ''are'' done in one big leap, as you could easily see by viewing my contributions. In this particular case, I ''chose'' to edit in stages to make it a little more clear what I’d done when somebody views the changes. I did end up with 4 edits instead of the two I had intended, but that arose from edit conflicts and human error, not a lack of previewing - nobody’s perfect. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 21:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | :I do use previews, and also view changes, before submitting( the only time I didn’t recently, due to the fucking session amnesia, [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=PS054&diff=prev&oldid=788819 it bit me in the ass]), so most of my edits ''are'' done in one big leap, as you could easily see by viewing my contributions. In this particular case, I ''chose'' to edit in stages to make it a little more clear what I’d done when somebody views the changes. I did end up with 4 edits instead of the two I had intended, but that arose from edit conflicts and human error, not a lack of previewing - nobody’s perfect. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 21:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
::No need to jump down the guy's throat, Galladeon. It's not like he's doing it on multiple pages. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#DAA520">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">chidna</span>]]''' 21:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Concerning [[User talk:TTEchidna|this]] == | |||
See [[Pokémon League entrance exam instructor]]...it's still not that repetitive. You should clearly define what YOU mean by repetitive. The articles are fine. [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#D5AA00"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#C0C0C0"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 11:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Talk:Blue (Special) == | |||
<sub>"The articles redirect, talk pages should too for now, especially since the move messed up a bunch of talk page links. When those are sorted out you could delete it again, though I don’t see why."</sub> | |||
:Did you check the [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Talk:Blue_(Special) WhatLinksHere page] for the article? They changed all the links on every page. So nothing links to that page. <sub style="color:#00008B;">'''[[User:Blake|Blake]]'''</sub> <sup>[[User talk:Blake#top|Talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Blake|Edits]]</sup> 17:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:As I was looking around, I noticed several instances of Talk:Blue (Special) had been changed to <nowiki>[[Talk:Blue (Adventures)|Talk:Blue (Special)]]</nowiki>, where clearly <nowiki>[[Talk:Green (Adventures)|Talk:Blue (Special)]]</nowiki> was intended, and instances of <nowiki>[[Talk:Blue (Special)|[other alternate text]]]</nowiki> are now <nowiki>[[Talk:Blue (Adventures)|[other alternate text]]]</nowiki>, also wrong. Given that talk page links are clearly NOT settled yet, and that anyone unused to the change may still type in the old names, it seems prudent to keep those redirects there at least until some time passes and all the links are fixed. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 17:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Electric Tale of Pikachu == | |||
I noticed what you did earlier today. You don't just start moving pages ''without'' the consent of an Administrator or the {{u|CoolPikachu!|Project Leader}} of {{bp|Project Manga}}. As for volumes, for the sake of consistency, don't move them ''at all''. Some of the other mangas may not have a title like Electric Tale but for consistency reasons, it says where it currently is. So next time try to ask or start a discussion (or continue an old discussion) the next time you want to move something. --[[Special:Contributions/CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#00AF33;">'''☆'''</span>]][[User:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#F8D030;">'''Cool'''</span>]][[User talk:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#0098d8;">'''ピカチュウ!'''</span>]] 00:00, 5 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Did you also notice that after I was reverted and told to wait for a decision, I not only did so, but apologized and started/continued those very discussions in two places? So far, everyone who has chimed in is still in favor of “The”. Are you against it, and if you have no opinion, how long do we wait for opposition before we can move it again? --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 13:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Edit warring on {{ga|Ethan}} == | |||
Stop it. You've been here long enough, you should know to not get into edit wars.--[[User:Pokelova|<span style="color:#DAA520">''Poké''</span>]][[User talk:Pokelova|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">lova!</span>]] 12:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
:You’re right, I have been here long enough. Longer than you( in fact, I have depressingly been using the Internet for longer than you, like a good number of editors, have been ''alive''), so please do give me a little bit of credit. I wouldn’t call that an edit war at that stage. I undid an edit that served only to create ambiguity in the text, and in the spirit of limiting the number of edits, I rolled a bit of copyediting in with that. That was reverted, but the reasons cited in the edit summary did not stand up to scrutiny, so I put back my edits, along with a few additional fixes. Had it been reverted again, I would have gone to the talk page to make an appeal. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 03:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
::^ this response is rude and uncalled for. Particularly the bit in the brackets. Stay within the {{bp|code of conduct}}, please. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 02:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::I don’t think it’s rude to ask that a little credit and good faith be given to someone whom Pokélova himself described as having been here long enough to be knowledgeable and experience - and since he did so in a rather patronizing tone, I think a reply was indeed called for. If the way I said what I said was rude, then he was just as rude – but frankly, I don’t believe either of us was really particularly uncivil. As for the part in parentheses, I was making a self-deprecating jab at my advanced age, not at his youth – I am quite unhappy these days about the proximity of 30. I have now rephrased that part to better convey my intention so others will not misinterpret it as you apparently did. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 11:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
== More edit warring == | |||
Also. Gender can be used to specify whether something is male or female. As stated in the first section of the Wikipedia article on gender (the one you linked me too), it says that gender is another word for sex. Yes, I know that scientists usually define them as separate terms, but gender can be defined as sex. Additionally, it's an in-game term. They could have called it "banana muffin" for all we care. It's not used incorrectly and yes you were edit warring. Two reverts is an edit war. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 02:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:O.K., first of all, forgive me if I’m mistaken, but you seem to be under the impression that I created that trivium about incorrect usage. I did not, I only added the Wikipedia links and a little bit about terminology. So you might want to make your argument to the person who ''did'' create it. Second, I ''didn’t'' revert twice. I reverted '''once''', then when that was reverted again by an admin I added a better targeted link. ''Then'' I decided that the new link was too similar( in being on the same page, despite being directed at a very different and more relevant section) so rather than wait to be accused of multiple reversions, I undid ''my own edit'' for the sake of cooperative spirit and added other, less controversial links. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 11:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Yellow's uncle == | |||
Wilton IS Yellow's uncle. While it's true that "Ojiisan" is a non literal honorary form most of the time, this is not the case here. He's clearly mentioned as being Yellow's uncle in Yellow's profile page in Volume 25 (under "family", go figure). Also, Netkun website often refers to him as "Yellow no Ojiisan". In this context, it's IMPOSSIBLE for "Ojiisan" to be a honorary term. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 13:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:...huh. O.K., I have not seen volume 25, sorry. It sure makes the VIZ translation awkward, though. Perhaps they made the same mistake I did. | |||
:What is Netkun? It doesn’t have an article here or on Wikipedia either. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 14:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:: [http://family.shogakukan.co.jp/kids/netkun/pokemon/official/ Netkun] is the official website for this series [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 14:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:::That really seems like it should have an article then, or at least a significant section on the series page. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 14:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Talk page converations == | |||
Please can you always add comments to the end of the section, rather than inserting it in the middle - it's likely that it'll get overlooked if it's put in the middle. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 07:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Code of conduct == | |||
Please note that an edit summary such as the one you did [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Florges_(Pok%C3%A9mon)&curid=184604&diff=2010199&oldid=2010084&rcid=2158629 here] is completely unacceptable. Calling another user stupid is against the {{BP|Code of conduct}} and should not be done for '''any''' reason. Do not do it again. --[[User:Funktastic~!|<span style="color:#009900">'''It's'''</span> <span style="color:#CC66FF">'''Funktastic~!'''</span>]][[User talk:Funktastic~!|<sub><small><span style="color:#99CCFF">''話してください''</span></small></sub>]] 22:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Talk page etiquette == | |||
Moved from the [[Talk:Gender]] talk page, where it was removed by {{u|Pokemaster97}}. | |||
==Talk page ettiquette== | |||
LaprasBoi, please '''never''' edit one of my comments or anyone else's again. I understand that you wanted to address my points separately, but it is '''highly''' against {{bp|Talk page policy|the rules}} to edit other people's comments, even if only to add spacing. I am '''extremely''' offended by your audacity. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 02:28, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Says the person who had the audacity to move/reorder my comments( which is '''exactly''' why I did it, ftr: to demonstrate for you the rudeness of your own actions). Forget rudeness, hypocrisy is worse than anything.( I’ve restored your comment to its original structure to avoid further ''offense''.) --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 02:41, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Let me quote the talk page policy at you, since you don't seem to have read it. ''New comments in a section must always go at the bottom of the section, regardless of where the comment being replied to is in the discussion; this helps keep comments in order and prevents confusion as to what had been discussed prior to specific comments.'' Thus, I was merely enforcing policy. You, on the other hand, deliberately changed my policy-complying comment to be ''against'' policy. It's not hypocrisy, it's bureaucracy. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 02:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::I read it... albeit a few years ago. ^_^; However; all my comments WERE, in fact, added to the bottom of the section already; your claim that you needed to rearrange them to achieve that is BS. I shouldn’t have edited spacing, it seems that is true; but you did NOT have a valid reason to rearrange my comments, either. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 03:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::Every time I corrected the order of your comments, it was because you added a comment in this fashion (times are made-up for explanatory purposes): | |||
:::::::someone's comment (2:00 p.m.) | |||
::::::::your comment (5:00 p.m.) | |||
:::::::another person's comment (3:00 p.m.) | |||
::::When the talk page policy says the bottom of the section, it means the bottom of the ''entire'' section, not just a further-indented level of comments directly below whomever you're answering. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 03:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::::That is simply not true: All my comments, despite indents, were at the bottom of the section( diff:[http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gender&diff=2010227&oldid=1971492])( that also shows admittedly inappropriate re-spacing of earlier comments; I have already conceded that point), when you first made a revision( [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gender&diff=2010258&oldid=2010227]) which rearranged comments made by me, but there were NO COMMENTS BY ANYONE ELSE anywhere in between. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 03:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::::It doesn't matter if the comments are by someone else or your own; putting a new comment anywhere above an old comment (you can tell by looking at the timestamps) is against policy. Your examples are misleading because they involve you re-adding comments that had previously been removed, but as you can see from the timestamps, your first example is breaking the rules and your second is me fixing it. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 04:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Edit summaries== | |||
[http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Nurse_Joy&curid=2982&diff=2334092&oldid=2333242 Can you at least not sound so rude?] This was really uncalled for. If an article is poorly worded, then fix the article, there's no need to attack others by calling them "children". I suggest you read and review the {{bp|Code of Conduct}} before making another edit.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 16:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Touchy, much? I wasn’t saying “children” as a disparaging epithet, I meant literal children. If the adults on this wiki are that ignorant, we have bigger problems than editors you perceive as rude. [[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 22:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
::I know what you meant by "children", and it's still rude. Regardless if the user you're referring to is a child. You don't just go around calling people names, if you don't have anything nice to say, then don't say it.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 04:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::What “names”? Clearly, you DON’T know what I mean by “children”; or else you don’t know what “disparaging” & “epithet” mean. Unless you’re accusing me of lying(<!--I have my own personal punctuation style in conversation, but I know when & where to use it, i.e., not in articles. As e.e. cummings said, one must first know the rules to break them effectively.--> when I said I didn’t mean it that way)? That would be pretty rude yourself. [[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 16:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::Calling others "children" is calling them names. And I said '''regardless''' if you're calling other users children or referring to an actual child, you can't just go around calling other users children. It's plain and simple, rude. I have noted throughout your talk page that your attitude has been a major problem in the past, I suggest you fix it. You say you are 30, then act 30.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 16:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::::So... calling children children is “rude”, but it's O.K. to call a 30-year-old out as a 30-year-old? Hypocrisy makes a minimal impression on me, so maybe you should stop & think before you speak. I almost always do, & what I say is quite intentional. I DO have a history, one which stretches back somewhat further than yours even if it’s not quite as illustrious.<!--No pretension here, b.t.w., I actually speak this way–& not to impress, I usually couldn’t care less what others think.( A common misapprehension.)--> What you call an attitude problem dates back to the old days, when I considered it saying what the editors in charge knew they had a moral responsibility not to. My obligation in that regard, as defined by the CoC, is significant but considerably less than that. ^_^ [[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 00:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::::I'm telling you to act your age. Calling other users "children who have yet to learn grammar or have a vocabulary" is '''very''' immature for a 30 year old. What you say is intentional? so you intentionally want to make others feel bad? Again, very immature for a 30 year old. You still have an attitude problem, it doesn't just date back to 2006, it dates back as recently as last year (the section above this one). You still act very aggressively to others, even if you think it isn't as bad as it was before, it's still in breach of the code of conduct.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 04:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | |||