User talk:LaprasBoi: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

User talk:LaprasBoi (view source)

Revision as of 04:03, 19 September 2015

9,342 bytes added , 19 September 2015

→‎Edit summaries

Force Fire

40,934

edits

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 :...huh. O.K., I have not seen volume 25, sorry. It sure makes the VIZ translation awkward, though. Perhaps they made the same mistake I did.
 :What is Netkun? It doesn’t have an article here or on Wikipedia either. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 14:02, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
+:: [http://family.shogakukan.co.jp/kids/netkun/pokemon/official/ Netkun] is the official website for this series [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 14:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
+:::That really seems like it should have an article then, or at least a significant section on the series page. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] 14:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
+== Talk page converations ==
+Please can you always add comments to the end of the section, rather than inserting it in the middle - it's likely that it'll get overlooked if it's put in the middle. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 07:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
+== Code of conduct ==
+Please note that an edit summary such as the one you did [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Florges_(Pok%C3%A9mon)&curid=184604&diff=2010199&oldid=2010084&rcid=2158629 here] is completely unacceptable.  Calling another user stupid is against the {{BP|Code of conduct}} and should not be done for '''any''' reason.  Do not do it again. --[[User:Funktastic~!|<span style="color:#009900">'''It's'''</span> <span style="color:#CC66FF">'''Funktastic~!'''</span>]][[User talk:Funktastic~!|<sub><small><span style="color:#99CCFF">''話してください''</span></small></sub>]] 22:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
+== Talk page etiquette ==
+Moved from the [[Talk:Gender]] talk page, where it was removed by {{u|Pokemaster97}}.
+==Talk page ettiquette==
+LaprasBoi, please '''never''' edit one of my comments or anyone else's again. I understand that you wanted to address my points separately, but it is '''highly''' against {{bp|Talk page policy|the rules}} to edit other people's comments, even if only to add spacing. I am '''extremely''' offended by your audacity. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 02:28, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
+:Says the person who had the audacity to move/reorder my comments( which is '''exactly''' why I did it, ftr: to demonstrate for you the rudeness of your own actions). Forget rudeness, hypocrisy is worse than anything.( I’ve restored your comment to its original structure to avoid further ''offense''.) --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 02:41, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
+::Let me quote the talk page policy at you, since you don't seem to have read it. ''New comments in a section must always go at the bottom of the section, regardless of where the comment being replied to is in the discussion; this helps keep comments in order and prevents confusion as to what had been discussed prior to specific comments.'' Thus, I was merely enforcing policy. You, on the other hand, deliberately changed my policy-complying comment to be ''against'' policy. It's not hypocrisy, it's bureaucracy. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 02:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
+:::I read it... albeit a few years ago. ^_^; However; all my comments WERE, in fact, added to the bottom of the section already; your claim that you needed to rearrange them to achieve that is BS. I shouldn’t have edited spacing, it seems that is true; but you did NOT have a valid reason to rearrange my comments, either. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 03:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
+::::Every time I corrected the order of your comments, it was because you added a comment in this fashion (times are made-up for explanatory purposes):
+:::::::someone's comment (2:00 p.m.)
+::::::::your comment (5:00 p.m.)
+:::::::another person's comment (3:00 p.m.)
+::::When the talk page policy says the bottom of the section, it means the bottom of the ''entire'' section, not just a further-indented level of comments directly below whomever you're answering. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 03:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
+:::::That is simply not true: All my comments, despite indents, were at the bottom of the section( diff:[http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gender&diff=2010227&oldid=1971492])( that also shows admittedly inappropriate re-spacing of earlier comments; I have already conceded that point), when you first made a revision( [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gender&diff=2010258&oldid=2010227]) which rearranged comments made by me, but there were NO COMMENTS BY ANYONE ELSE anywhere in between. --[[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 03:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
+::::::It doesn't matter if the comments are by someone else or your own; putting a new comment anywhere above an old comment (you can tell by looking at the timestamps) is against policy. Your examples are misleading because they involve you re-adding comments that had previously been removed, but as you can see from the timestamps, your first example is breaking the rules and your second is me fixing it. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 04:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
+==Edit summaries==
+[http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Nurse_Joy&curid=2982&diff=2334092&oldid=2333242 Can you at least not sound so rude?] This was really uncalled for. If an article is poorly worded, then fix the article, there's no need to attack others by calling them "children". I suggest you read and review the {{bp|Code of Conduct}} before making another edit.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 16:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
+:Touchy, much? I wasn’t saying “children” as a disparaging epithet, I meant literal children. If the adults on this wiki are that ignorant, we have bigger problems than editors you perceive as rude. [[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 22:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
+::I know what you meant by "children", and it's still rude. Regardless if the user you're referring to is a child. You don't just go around calling people names, if you don't have anything nice to say, then don't say it.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 04:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
+:::What “names”? Clearly, you DON’T know what I mean by “children”; or else you don’t know what “disparaging” & “epithet” mean. Unless you’re accusing me of lying(<!--I have my own personal punctuation style in conversation, but I know when & where to use it, i.e., not in articles. As e.e. cummings said, one must first know the rules to break them effectively.--> when I said I didn’t mean it that way)? That would be pretty rude yourself. [[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 16:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
+::::Calling others "children" is calling them names. And I said '''regardless''' if you're calling other users children or referring to an actual child, you can't just go around calling other users children. It's plain and simple, rude. I have noted throughout your talk page that your attitude has been a major problem in the past, I suggest you fix it. You say you are 30, then act 30.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 16:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
+:::::So... calling children children is “rude”, but it's O.K. to call a 30-year-old out as a 30-year-old? Hypocrisy makes a minimal impression on me, so maybe you should stop & think before you speak. I almost always do, & what I say is quite intentional. I DO have a history, one which stretches back somewhat further than yours even if it’s not quite as illustrious.<!--No pretension here, b.t.w., I actually speak this way–& not to impress, I usually couldn’t care less what others think.( A common misapprehension.)--> What you call an attitude problem dates back to the old days, when I considered it saying what the editors in charge knew they had a moral responsibility not to. My obligation in that regard, as defined by the CoC, is significant but considerably less than that. ^_^ [[User:LaprasBoi|LaprasBoi]] ([[User talk:LaprasBoi|talk]]) 00:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
+::::::I'm telling you to act your age. Calling other users "children who have yet to learn grammar or have a vocabulary" is '''very''' immature for a 30 year old. What you say is intentional? so you intentionally want to make others feel bad? Again, very immature for a 30 year old. You still have an attitude problem, it doesn't just date back to 2006, it dates back as recently as last year (the section above this one). You still act very aggressively to others, even if you think it isn't as bad as it was before, it's still in breach of the code of conduct.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 04:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)