40,890
edits
User talk:IWannaBeTheVeryBest: Difference between revisions
→Pokémon Trainer's Choice
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
:::You're being too technical. You think 4kids actually knew anything about the technical aspects of Pokémon? '''They told us that Arbok evolved into Seviper.''' They knew nothing. Taillow was added not because it is equally as good as Torkoal (because it isn't), it's mentioned because it has a '''type that is super effective against Shiftry'''. The Togetic note is too technical, again, 4kids knew nothing of the technical aspects of the franchise, so that shouldn't note the technicalities of the question. Again, they are there '''not''' because they are equally as good, but they are there because because they '''have a type that is super effective against the opponent'''.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 16:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC) | :::You're being too technical. You think 4kids actually knew anything about the technical aspects of Pokémon? '''They told us that Arbok evolved into Seviper.''' They knew nothing. Taillow was added not because it is equally as good as Torkoal (because it isn't), it's mentioned because it has a '''type that is super effective against Shiftry'''. The Togetic note is too technical, again, 4kids knew nothing of the technical aspects of the franchise, so that shouldn't note the technicalities of the question. Again, they are there '''not''' because they are equally as good, but they are there because because they '''have a type that is super effective against the opponent'''.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 16:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::I'm really not. My version of the notes would be shorter and simpler. "Choice B is the best because of its X advantage/s and Y resistance/s." That's it. Taillow's type is equally good against a Grass type as Torkoal's is. Come on, FF, You know better than to even think about stats when these questions are only about typing. Togetic/Dustox is the only "technical" one and it's not hard to understand at all: one has offensive advantages, and the other, defensive. Again, that criteria is your opinion alone. Mentioning every favorable match-up is neither relevant to the question, notable in this encyclopedia, nor useful to the reader. This has gone on long enough. Please discuss this with another administrator or allow me to do so. —<font face="Segoe UI"><span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em">[[User:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="#fff">The</font>]]Very[[User talk:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="red">Best</font>]]</span></font> 02:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC) | ::::I'm really not. My version of the notes would be shorter and simpler. "Choice B is the best because of its X advantage/s and Y resistance/s." That's it. Taillow's type is equally good against a Grass type as Torkoal's is. Come on, FF, You know better than to even think about stats when these questions are only about typing. Togetic/Dustox is the only "technical" one and it's not hard to understand at all: one has offensive advantages, and the other, defensive. Again, that criteria is your opinion alone. Mentioning every favorable match-up is neither relevant to the question, notable in this encyclopedia, nor useful to the reader. This has gone on long enough. Please discuss this with another administrator or allow me to do so. —<font face="Segoe UI"><span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em">[[User:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="#fff">The</font>]]Very[[User talk:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="red">Best</font>]]</span></font> 02:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::Talking about resistances '''is being technical'''. Talking about which one is equally effective '''is being technical'''. My version is just basically "X would be a possible choice because it is Y type, which is good against Z". No talking about resistance, '''at all'''. Saying Taillow is equally effective as Torkoal '''is being technical''', because when your saying something is '''equally''' effective you are basically implying stats. Dustox is only better by '''technicality''', but strip it down to just offensive advantages (which is what the question asks), then Togetic would be best. The notes generally '''will not''' have anything to do with the question. It's just there to say "Hey, you could also choose X because it's Y type as well". It's not saying or suggesting that it's the best choice, it's just a "did you know" sort of thing. And this did not need to go on for as long as it did, I understand what you're trying to say, but in my opinion you are being too technical on a quiz that was not well thought out.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 04:55, 8 April 2015 (UTC) | |||