User talk:GrammarFreak01/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

User talk:GrammarFreak01/Archive 1 (view source)

Revision as of 08:40, 18 December 2020

6,467 bytes added , 18 December 2020

no edit summary

GrammarFreak01

86,550

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+*[[User talk:GrammarFreak01/Archive 1]] (November 7, 2013 &ndash; June 14, 2018)
+*[[User talk:GrammarFreak01/Archive 2]] (June 17, 2018 &ndash; November 23, 2018)
+*[[User talk:GrammarFreak01/Archive 3]] (November 23, 2018 &ndash; June 21, 2019)
+*[[User talk:GrammarFreak01/Archive 4]] (June 21, 2019 &ndash; January 27, 2020)
+*[[User talk:GrammarFreak01/Archive 5]] (January 27, 2020 &ndash; December 18, 2020)
+{{-}}
 {| cellspacing="7" class="roundy" style="margin:auto; border: 1px solid #3e7614; background: #FFFFFF;"
@@ Line 441: / Line 447: @@
 ::::::On a final note, though, petulant/accusatory comments like "Hope you're happy" aren't really helping anyone involved. You're welcome to personally be dissatisfied with an outcome, but that doesn't make it okay to lash out. If you're dissatisfied, ForceFire is the one who did it, talk to ForceFire. In the meantime, {{bp|Code of conduct|be nice}}, please.  [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 11:33, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 :::::::I was seriously not trying to put you down, I was just trying to help you since that I was slightly concerned by some comments. Some users are only here to cause chaos and no amount of talking or telling off can sort it out. Again, I had no benefit from this, I just want you to stay safe. '''Ice''' [[User talk:The IceCream|Cream]] 15:18, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
+::::::::Edgreen was clearly just misguided with his editing practices, not intentionally trying to cause chaos. If he were trying to cause chaos, he would've been indeffed quickly. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 19:33, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
+::::::::: Decent point. Let's just leave him to ForceFire now. '''Ice''' [[User talk:The IceCream|Cream]] 21:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 == Removing comments ==
@@ Line 449: / Line 457: @@
 ::It's fine, just thought I'd let you know. --[[User:Celadonkey|Celadonkey]] 22:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 :::Well, I just restored the comment and struck it. I realized that was a thing too. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 22:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
+== For clarity's sake ==
+>Not sure how this is relevant to Cyndaquil.
+It's called adding context to aid comprehension, but it's too late at night for an edit dispute for me, so you do you. I just wanted to say that.
+[[User:Horo-kun|Horo-kun]] ([[User talk:Horo-kun|talk]]) 21:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+:Unless the robe requested by Kaguya-hime also has some direct association with how Cyndaquil was created, I feel it does not contribute to the section at all. It's just a random piece of trivia from where I'm standing. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 21:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+::It's the source through which the ''huo shu'' is the most famous, and adding that bit of information helps comprehend what the creature is based on relative familiarity. But god forbid people learn something new, am I right? Nevermind that assuming the contrary throws the very utility of the trivia section into question.
+::[[User:Horo-kun|Horo-kun]] ([[User talk:Horo-kun|talk]]) 21:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+:::But does it have anything to do with Cyndaquil itself? That's the important thing. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 21:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+::::It falls within the scope of explaining what Cyndaquil is based on, so yes, it is relevant. [[User:Horo-kun|Horo-kun]] ([[User talk:Horo-kun|talk]]) 21:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+:::::Okay, so what part of it directly inspired Cyndaquil? [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 21:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+:::::: Thank you for completely ignoring what I just said, but if I must answer the very likely scenario is the creators first heard of the creature through the classic fairytale than the original legends, which are difficult to research.[[User:Horo-kun|Horo-kun]] ([[User talk:Horo-kun|talk]]) 21:21, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+:::::::I did not ignore what you just said. I just think your reasoning for including it is not good enough to excuse inclusion. From where I'm standing, "Origin" sections always talk about the things that inspired the Pokémon of concern, and they do not go off on small tangents for the sake of "clarification". Nothing more, nothing less. If the robe itself played a part in the inspiration of Cyndaquil, yes, it could be included. But if it's just going to be included for the sole sake of bringing further context on the legend that inspired Cyndaquil, then I don't see what's the point of its inclusion if it didn't inspire Cyndaquil itself. Why go off on this tangent in the "Origin" section if it has nothing to do with Cyndaquil's origin?
+:::::::The robe didn't even help "clarify" the legend for me, because I know absolutely nothing about it in the first place. The only people who would benefit from this, if needs be, would be people familiar with the legend itself. And I doubt everybody who visits this site would be aware of it unlike me. For the most part, it's just a piece of trivia that should belong on the "Trivia" section itself, if needs be. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 21:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+:::::::: You know what? I explained it the best I could and it still didn't get through, so sod this, I have more important things to do tonight.[[User:Horo-kun|Horo-kun]] ([[User talk:Horo-kun|talk]]) 21:36, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+:::::::::Well, I'm sleepy too, so I apologize if I might've missed anything. But I'm pretty sure I didn't. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 21:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
+== Major events ==
+[[Special:Diff/2807386|This]] is the last thing from important. No one can see it and they're ''old'' episodes. If it's not actively a problem&mdash;for a ''specific'' page&mdash;it's fine as is. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 05:05, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
+:Why do all of the recent episodes have it, then? [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 05:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
+::The answer isn't going to change the fact that there's no good reason to add it to OLD episodes. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 05:11, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
+:::Then you won't mind if I remove those from recent episodes...? [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 05:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
+::::You've tried that exact tack {{DL||Pointless edits|before}} and it's entirely as obvious now as it was then. You're just being contrary. As far as I'm concerned, if you act on that contrariness, you're asking for a block. You know better. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 06:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
+GrammarFreak, the old episodes don't have the hidden notes because they were made ''before'' we had the New Episode template. You don't need to go around adding the hidden note to the old episodes, it's a waste of time. And seeing as you have this thing to get to 10,000 edits a year, it can be seen as spamming for personal gain. And don't try to be smart by suggesting to remove the hidden note from recent episodes, you're clearly looking for a reaction. May I remind you that you are walking a very thin line in regards to making pointless edits. Don't make pointless edits and try to be snarky when things don't go your way, you only have one chance.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 10:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)