24,999
edits
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 7: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
Playerking95 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1,423: | Line 1,423: | ||
Could you please stop Blancbpg from reverting edits that have no business being reverted, like mentioning Olympia's flashback of old appearances, when they don't need to be there, since the episode that the flashbacks are from have already been referenced. And I don't think characters being mentioned by people count as appearances and aren't all that worthy of being referenced as well. He/she never seems to be listening to what people have been saying to him/her. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 05:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC) | Could you please stop Blancbpg from reverting edits that have no business being reverted, like mentioning Olympia's flashback of old appearances, when they don't need to be there, since the episode that the flashbacks are from have already been referenced. And I don't think characters being mentioned by people count as appearances and aren't all that worthy of being referenced as well. He/she never seems to be listening to what people have been saying to him/her. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 05:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
:We do include mentions and flashbacks, look at other anime pages. It's the episode pages where mentions aren't counted as appearance.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 06:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC) | :We do include mentions and flashbacks, look at other anime pages. It's the episode pages where mentions aren't counted as appearance.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 06:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
::Except that we don't and that's just utterly stupid to do so. Why mention a characters appearance when it's already been mentioned in the same page. It's not a new appearance, just because some white border is surrounding the scene and mentions shouldn't count either, because if so, then why not just add mentions of specific Pokemon to their respective pages? It makes sense to add them to the episode page, because they did, in some way, appear there, but their article's shouldn't list the same appearance multiple times. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 13:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC) | |||