313
edits
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 7: Difference between revisions
→"Don't Be Ridiculous"
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1,465: | Line 1,465: | ||
::This doesn't argue against my point. Attract may not work that way in the anime for all we know it could just be that it works on a Pokémon who is attracted to the user so Pikachu could be a lesbian female or a bisexual. This site always states something like falling in love doesn't confirm gender so for instance Charizard is stated to be "unknown" even though it fell in love with a female Cahrizard yet it is allowed in this instance. Why is all of this trivia relevant on that page but not on his other Pokémon's pages, please give me objective criteria that allows it in this instance.[[User:Ratchet and Clank 1995|Ratchet and Clank 1995]] ([[User talk:Ratchet and Clank 1995|talk]]) 18:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC) | ::This doesn't argue against my point. Attract may not work that way in the anime for all we know it could just be that it works on a Pokémon who is attracted to the user so Pikachu could be a lesbian female or a bisexual. This site always states something like falling in love doesn't confirm gender so for instance Charizard is stated to be "unknown" even though it fell in love with a female Cahrizard yet it is allowed in this instance. Why is all of this trivia relevant on that page but not on his other Pokémon's pages, please give me objective criteria that allows it in this instance.[[User:Ratchet and Clank 1995|Ratchet and Clank 1995]] ([[User talk:Ratchet and Clank 1995|talk]]) 18:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::Attract '''does''' work the same way as it does in the games. Snivy used attract on Ash's Pidove and it failed because both were female. There. There's your confirmation the the move works the same way as the game. {{m|Attract}} and attraction are two separate things. People base attraction off behavioral patterns, and apparently, only guys are allowed to be attracted to girls and vice versa. Pikachu is '''far more important''' than Leavanny, that's why it gets mentioned on Pikachu's page and not Leavanny's.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 03:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC) | :::Attract '''does''' work the same way as it does in the games. Snivy used attract on Ash's Pidove and it failed because both were female. There. There's your confirmation the the move works the same way as the game. {{m|Attract}} and attraction are two separate things. People base attraction off behavioral patterns, and apparently, only guys are allowed to be attracted to girls and vice versa. Pikachu is '''far more important''' than Leavanny, that's why it gets mentioned on Pikachu's page and not Leavanny's.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 03:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::Could it not just be that Pidove is just a heterosexual female so attract wouldn't work on it. If attract only works in the same way as the games that would mean that there wouldn't be any bisexual or homosexual Pokémon because as Blisseyandtheaquajets said that would be incredibly homophobic for a possibly homosexual male to fall in love with a female via attract for example. So I guess Charizard is male. I did ask for objective criteria not just that it's more important which is incredibly arbitrary. I guess then if Pikachu is more important it could get many pieces of trivia that you probably won't think is "notable" yet this apparently is. Come to think of it how is any piece of trivia on this site "notable" there is no objective way of determining it I guess it just if you admins agree with it or not. What's the point of discussing anything with you you always say "don't edit war discuss it" but this does nothing and you keep reverting people many times without discussing it. SilverZoroark raised a similar point on their talk page and said that they aren't using this site anymore because you admins treat people like scum. When on this site have you ever admitted to being wrong? Please answer this question[[User:Ratchet and Clank 1995|Ratchet and Clank 1995]] ([[User talk:Ratchet and Clank 1995|talk]]) 08:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC) | |||