User talk:Force Fire/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1,526: Line 1,526:
:::::::::Just to pose the question then if it is basically the same thing and not worth changing why do you take the time to change it back? It's not like GrammerFreak01 is hurting anything.--[[User:Pikablu|Pikablu]] ([[User talk:Pikablu|talk]]) 13:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
:::::::::Just to pose the question then if it is basically the same thing and not worth changing why do you take the time to change it back? It's not like GrammerFreak01 is hurting anything.--[[User:Pikablu|Pikablu]] ([[User talk:Pikablu|talk]]) 13:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
::::::::::I had a similar conflict with you and can provide another point of view. Therefore, I am a part of this conversation. I did provide evidence, you just dismissed it without any proof of your own opinions. I was involved in one edit war, and have changed how I proceed with reversions to avoid causing or contributing to them. May I also point out [[User_talk:Pokemaster97#Request|this response]] you received from an editorial board member when you made a very similar request almost a month ago on this same topic? You were specifically told that nothing happened against policy and that your constant reversions out of "revenge" were not the way to go about settling the disputes. You are just looking for anyone on staff to take your side to feel vindicated, and so far I have seen two staff members (one being an editorial board member) tell you that you are in the wrong in your views, yet you refuse to listen to them. I've said all I needed to now, apologies for the email spam ForceFire, I just had to join in, as I said, to provide my point of view from a nearly identical situation a month ago. [[User:ChE clarinetist|ChE clarinetist]] ([[User talk:ChE clarinetist|talk]]) 13:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
::::::::::I had a similar conflict with you and can provide another point of view. Therefore, I am a part of this conversation. I did provide evidence, you just dismissed it without any proof of your own opinions. I was involved in one edit war, and have changed how I proceed with reversions to avoid causing or contributing to them. May I also point out [[User_talk:Pokemaster97#Request|this response]] you received from an editorial board member when you made a very similar request almost a month ago on this same topic? You were specifically told that nothing happened against policy and that your constant reversions out of "revenge" were not the way to go about settling the disputes. You are just looking for anyone on staff to take your side to feel vindicated, and so far I have seen two staff members (one being an editorial board member) tell you that you are in the wrong in your views, yet you refuse to listen to them. I've said all I needed to now, apologies for the email spam ForceFire, I just had to join in, as I said, to provide my point of view from a nearly identical situation a month ago. [[User:ChE clarinetist|ChE clarinetist]] ([[User talk:ChE clarinetist|talk]]) 13:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
:::::::::::At Pikablu, because it's the principal of the matter and as I have said time and time again, if there's no difference than WHY change things that are fine to similar things that are also fine it in the first place? I'm waiting for a good reason and I know there isn't one.
:::::::::::At Che, I don't care if the previous conversation was the same word for word with a couple of little differences, this is still a different situation, and this has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with you. This is just a question I'm asking Force Fire, not you, not GrammarFreak, not Pikablu, not anyone else. So don't go acting like you HAD to answer here and that you were right, because, I've said that I don't believe that you are and I'm allowed to have that opinion. You did not provide any definitive evidence and just because you don't edit war anymore, like me, it doesn't change the fact that you still did it, so you can never tell me off for doing something that you've also done. And I know what others have said, and I've said before that even though it's not against policy, it's something that should not happening and this has nothing to do with revenge, so along with being hypocritical, please also stop exaggerating. I am not looking for vindication, I'm just asking for a staff members opinion on whether or not in it's a matter that should be looked at or not, that's all, so don't make things into things that they aren't and as I've said, while they may think that I wrong, it doesn't mean that they are right. I don't believe that unnecessary edits should be made and the fact that they think they should doesn't mean that they are wrong, because we both have our own opinions. I'm not saying that I'm going to go against what they're saying to do, I'm just arguing against unnecessary edits[[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 14:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
24,994

edits