User talk:Force Fire/Archive 10: Difference between revisions

(→‎My Edits: new section)
Line 1,548: Line 1,548:
::I'm still pretty convinced that there are things that are notable, despite them not being unique. Uniqueness isn't the only criteria for being interesting. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#00A1E9">cela</span><span style="color:#BF004F">donk</span>]] ([[User talk:Celadonkey|talk]]) 02:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
::I'm still pretty convinced that there are things that are notable, despite them not being unique. Uniqueness isn't the only criteria for being interesting. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#00A1E9">cela</span><span style="color:#BF004F">donk</span>]] ([[User talk:Celadonkey|talk]]) 02:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Well said. So can we please reword the Sirfetch'd thing? [[User:Unowninator|¿¡Unowninator?!]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 17:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Well said. So can we please reword the Sirfetch'd thing? [[User:Unowninator|¿¡Unowninator?!]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 17:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
:::I agree that the Sirfetch'd and Bellossom trivia is notable, but Force Fire undid my revision without providing any reason. There is a lot of trivia on this site that isn't unique, for example Muk AND Mew having the shortest names so that whole "not unique=not notable" isn't true.[[User:Huntress|Huntress]] ([[User talk:Huntress|talk]]) 10:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)


== Candidates for moving ==
== Candidates for moving ==
97

edits