86,550
edits
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 10: Difference between revisions
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 10 (view source)
Revision as of 02:39, 14 December 2019
, 14 December 2019→Pokemon should be discussed as a species, not individual pokemon.
(→Charizard origin source?: new section) |
|||
| Line 1,834: | Line 1,834: | ||
When speaking about the behaviors of Pokemon, or things that affect or are applicable to a species of Pokemon as a whole, the Pokemon should be referenced in plural form. For instance, under Origin on the Cursola page, "Cursola appears" should be "Cursola appear", because this section describes the origin of all Cursola, not just one member of this species. | When speaking about the behaviors of Pokemon, or things that affect or are applicable to a species of Pokemon as a whole, the Pokemon should be referenced in plural form. For instance, under Origin on the Cursola page, "Cursola appears" should be "Cursola appear", because this section describes the origin of all Cursola, not just one member of this species. | ||
This is proper grammar. Let me know your thoughts on the contrary. Thank you for your time! :) | This is proper grammar. Let me know your thoughts on the contrary. Thank you for your time! :) {{unsigned|Evanodson1}} | ||
== Charizard origin source? == | == Charizard origin source? == | ||
Hi, I'd like to point out that the TCG source about Charizard being inspired by dragons is a source used by Wikipedia; what makes it not official confirmation? It's publicity from TPCI stating that Charizard and Gyarados are inspired by dragons. --[[User:Darthrai|Darthrai]] ([[User talk:Darthrai|talk]]) 19:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC) | Hi, I'd like to point out that the TCG source about Charizard being inspired by dragons is a source used by Wikipedia; what makes it not official confirmation? It's publicity from TPCI stating that Charizard and Gyarados are inspired by dragons. --[[User:Darthrai|Darthrai]] ([[User talk:Darthrai|talk]]) 19:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC) | ||