User talk:Force Fire/Archive 10: Difference between revisions

m
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1,542: Line 1,542:
Thank you Celdadonkey. So what do you say ForceFire? [[User:Unowninator|¿¡Unowninator?!]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 19:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Celdadonkey. So what do you say ForceFire? [[User:Unowninator|¿¡Unowninator?!]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 19:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
:Reworded to to sound like less of a uniqueness trivia. Saying they've all been in every regional Pokedex is not the same as saying two things share an attribute.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 07:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
:Reworded to to sound like less of a uniqueness trivia. Saying they've all been in every regional Pokedex is not the same as saying two things share an attribute.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 07:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
::It's saying that ''five'' things share an attribute. Multiple evolution lines being in every regional Pokedex is also "sharing an attribute". It ''is'' the same. If anything, it's worse, if we go by the principle of "not unique=not notable".
::So why not reword the Sirfetch'd example too? "Sirfetch'd loses a type upon evolution, like Bellossom." But Unowninator's original wording is less clunky, as well as being more interesting, as was the original wording on the list by evolution family. IMO, both should be kept as what they said in the links provided above by Unowninator.
::I'm still pretty convinced that there are things that are notable, despite them not being unique. Uniqueness isn't the only criteria for being interesting. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#00A1E9">cela</span><span style="color:#BF004F">donk</span>]] ([[User talk:Celadonkey|talk]]) 02:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)


== Candidates for moving ==
== Candidates for moving ==


Can I move [[User:TheICTLiker4/E O]], [[User:TheICTLiker4/Template:User GO Team]] and [[User:TheICTLiker4/Template:GO Strongest]] to the corresponding namespaces? (''E O'' — to the main namespace, ''User GO Team'' and ''GO Strongest'' — to the ''Template'' namespace) --[[User:TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#7b7">'''TheICT'''</span>]][[User talk:TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#363">'''Liker'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#585">'''4'''</span>]] 16:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Can I move [[User:TheICTLiker4/E O]], [[User:TheICTLiker4/Template:User GO Team]] and [[User:TheICTLiker4/Template:GO Strongest]] to the corresponding namespaces? (''E O'' — to the main namespace, ''User GO Team'' and ''GO Strongest'' — to the ''Template'' namespace) --[[User:TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#7b7">'''TheICT'''</span>]][[User talk:TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#363">'''Liker'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/TheICTLiker4|<span style="color:#585">'''4'''</span>]] 16:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
== Edit to Ash Ketchum==
Hey, I was hoping to get more context on your revision to my edit on [[Ash Ketchum]], especially why you felt that removing an internal link to the first Pokemon film to not star Ash (something with historical significance) was needed and extra especially why you wonder why pointing out that he hasn't starred in every Pokemon movie is even needed considering "Ash has starred in every Pokemon film" is factually untrue and has no buisness being on an encyclopedia. {{unsigned|Wendigo}}
1,443

edits