40,881
edits
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 10: Difference between revisions
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 10 (view source)
Revision as of 17:38, 23 October 2019
, 23 October 2019→Ash's Rowlet and Pumpkinking's block
Force Fire (talk | contribs) (→Ash's Rowlet and Pumpkinking's block: I'll get to the other two comments later) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1,661: | Line 1,661: | ||
I genuinely hope this message helps you self-reflect and reconsider your actions. I'll be waiting to read your response soon. Sincerely, [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 16:49, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | I genuinely hope this message helps you self-reflect and reconsider your actions. I'll be waiting to read your response soon. Sincerely, [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 16:49, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
:1) There is no other reasoning. The reasoning in the hidden | :1) There is no other reasoning. The reasoning in the hidden note '''is''' the reason why that trivium shouldn't be allowed. The whole "working on the assumption that one..." comment is something that doesn't need to be said and is just understood by the context of the trivia itself. It is '''not''' the reason why the fully evolved trivia is not notable. | ||
:2) I told Pumpkinking to take it to the talk page. Which he did. But he still reverted the edit anyway even after leaving a message, prompting me to lock the page for a day. You do '''not''' leave a message on the talk page and continue to revert an edit. You leave a message and '''wait''' for a response, which Pumpkin apparently did not have the patience for. I also did not ignore Pumpkin's comments, I responded to each one. Not sure how you missed my comments when my signature is bright yellow. | :2) I told Pumpkinking to take it to the talk page. Which he did. But he still reverted the edit anyway even after leaving a message, prompting me to lock the page for a day. You do '''not''' leave a message on the talk page and continue to revert an edit. You leave a message and '''wait''' for a response, which Pumpkin apparently did not have the patience for. I also did not ignore Pumpkin's comments, I responded to each one. Not sure how you missed my comments when my signature is bright yellow. | ||
:3) Is continuing to revert the edit after staff told him not to not disobeying staff? What would it be then? Had he actually listened and not reverted my edits, then I would not have blocked him. | :3) Is continuing to revert the edit after staff told him not to not disobeying staff? What would it be then? Had he actually listened and not reverted my edits, then I would not have blocked him. | ||
:5) I went with a harsher tone in the edit summary and harsher tone in the message because Pumpkin has a '''history''' of ignoring staff messages and continuing edit wars. You have not be here long enough to know how Pumpkinking edits and behaves. He has been blocked before for similar behaviors. Don't act like you know Pumpkinking's editing patterns. If it was anyone else with such a long and "decorated" history, I would've also given them a harsh penalty based off that. | :5) I went with a harsher tone in the edit summary and harsher tone in the message because Pumpkin has a '''history''' of ignoring staff messages and continuing edit wars. You have not be here long enough to know how Pumpkinking edits and behaves. He has been blocked before for similar behaviors. Don't act like you know Pumpkinking's editing patterns. If it was anyone else with such a long and "decorated" history, I would've also given them a harsh penalty based off that. | ||
:6) There is nothing to "self reflect" on my end. Pumpkinking was being the usual stubborn Pumpkinking he has always been. Not sure why you think this was necessary | :6) There is nothing to "self reflect" on my end. Pumpkinking was being the usual stubborn Pumpkinking he has always been. Not sure why you think this was necessary when 1) you don't know his history and 2) the matter has been resolved (for now).--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 17:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
== Inconsistency == | == Inconsistency == | ||
For a good time now, I've been bugged by the fact that the downloadable PWT tournament about the Unova League is title as "You Can Challenge the '''Isshu''' League Too!" while another downloadable tournament is titled "Challenge the Champion '''Lance'''". Shouldn't the Unova League tournament's title be translated as "You Can Challenge the Unova League Too!" for consistency's sake? --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 17:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | For a good time now, I've been bugged by the fact that the downloadable PWT tournament about the Unova League is title as "You Can Challenge the '''Isshu''' League Too!" while another downloadable tournament is titled "Challenge the Champion '''Lance'''". Shouldn't the Unova League tournament's title be translated as "You Can Challenge the Unova League Too!" for consistency's sake? --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 17:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC) | ||