262
edits
User talk:Dinosauramiable: Difference between revisions
→Edit warring
(I created the wrong one) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== The Preview Button == | == The Preview Button == | ||
Instead of editing a page several times in a row, try using the preview button to make sure your edit looks the way you want it to. It's right next to the Save Page button. Please try it out, so as not to clog up the Recent Changes. Also, if you want to edit multiple sections of the page, make sure that you click "edit this page" at the top of the page rather than editing it by section. Thanks! --[[User:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Patty</span>]][[User talk:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Man</span>]] 01:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC) | Instead of editing a page several times in a row, try using the preview button to make sure your edit looks the way you want it to. It's right next to the Save Page button. Please try it out, so as not to clog up the Recent Changes. Also, if you want to edit multiple sections of the page, make sure that you click "edit this page" at the top of the page rather than editing it by section. Thanks! --[[User:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Patty</span>]][[User talk:Pattyman|<span style="color:orange">Man</span>]] 01:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Edit warring == | |||
Hello. When one of your edits is reverted, it's best to talk about the reversion on the talk page of the user who did it instead of just reverting it back. That's what called an "edit war", and those aren't advised. That being said, I do not agree with your edit. Your edit summary said that "there could be other types Psychic is weak to", which is completely incorrect. The types that activate Rattled are the only ones Psychic is weak to, as of the current Gen. Second, if there was a hypothetical situation where a new type is introduced that Psychic is weak to, "all" would still be grammatically appropriate, even if the new type does not activate Rattled. Thank you. [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] ([[User talk:Ataro|talk]]) 00:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
I'm sorry for edit warring. But you don't understand what I mean by "could be". Here's an example; except for Sylveon, the types of the [[Eeveelutions]] are all pre-Gen IV Special types (Fairy probably would have been Special if it existed at the time, but that's speculation), but there's no Dragon-type Eeveelution, and Dragon was a Special type. On the other hand, the types that activate Rattled are the same types that Psychic is weak to (Bug, Ghost and Dark). To a person who doesn't know all the type matchups or which types were physical or special, there ''could be'' other types Psychic is weak to, and there could be Eeveelutions for all the former special types. That's why I made that distinction. [[User:Dinosauramiable|Dinosauramiable]] ([[User talk:Dinosauramiable|talk]]) 00:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
Another thing to mention; the {{t|Psychic}} page says "the types that activate Rattled are the weaknesses of the Psychic type", not "the types that activate Rattled are all strong against the Psychic type", so it's less ambiguous than what's now on the Ability's page. [[User:Dinosauramiable|Dinosauramiable]] ([[User talk:Dinosauramiable|talk]]) 12:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC) | |||