Welcome to Bulbapedia, Blueclue26!
Bulbapedia bulb.png

By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:

  • Be nice to everyone. It's in the code of conduct.
  • Make good edits. Preview them before you save to make sure they're perfect the first time around.
  • Use wikicode and link templates when adding content to a page.
  • Use proper grammar and spelling, and read the manual of style.
  • You can't create a userpage until you've added to the encyclopedia. It's a privilege. See the userspace policy.
  • Use talk pages to resolve editing disputes. Don't "edit war," or constantly re-edit/undo the same thing on a page.
  • If you have a question about something, be proactive. Take a look at our FAQ. If you're still stuck, ask for help. The staff won't bite.
  • Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~). This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment.
  • For more handy links, see the welcome portal.
Thank you, and have a good time editing here!
  Raltseye prata med mej 19:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)  
 

Officer Jenny

Hey, when someone explains in an edit summary why something should not be done the way you did it, please don't just change it back to your way, especially without explanation. This is called edit warring. Instead of edit warring, please go to a talk page to discuss why you think it should be your way. In this particular case, as I explained in my edit summary, it is an assumption that Officer Jenny gave the Squirtle Squad away. There are many other possible explanations for their appearance at Oak's Lab, and we don't know which explanation is true, so "Unknown" is the best possible header for that section. Thanks for your understanding. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 21:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Again, I urge you to use talk pages and edit summaries instead of changing things without explanation. On Ash Ketchum, Squirtle's placement outside the "Oak's Lab" section was explicitly based on a staff judgment on Talk:Ash's Squirtle, so it shouldn't be undone just because you like your way better. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 02:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Pointless edits

Is there a reason you have been continually undoing and redoing the same pointless minor edits on EP002 and EP004? Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 16:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

XY121

Please stop adding Wulfric to the list of characters. As pointed out in the hidden note that you should not have removed, recaps do not count as the character appearing. --HoennMaster 02:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Also, please stop changing the words flashback and recap around on other episodes. This is disruptive editing. --HoennMaster 02:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Please cease your edit warring and other disruptive edits, Blueclue26, and consult our code of conduct, please. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 21:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
You do not seem to have learned to use talk pages and edit summaries to resolve questions and issues. Please do so instead of edit warring. In the particular case of the page I linked, the reason your edit is being removed is the same one that HoennMaster gave at the top of this section: recaps do not count as the character appearing. Thanks for your understanding, and please use a talk page in the future. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 01:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Undubbed parts of episodes (and, again, edit warring)

Again, I must ask you not to keep doing the same thing over and over without justification, even though people are explaining why it's wrong in edit summaries.

In this particular case, you have been adding the title Alola, Kanto! to several places it should not go. When a part of an episode is undubbed, like a Poké Problem or a Dare da, references to that part always use the bare epicode (like SM042), not the dubbed episode title. This is because the parts being referenced are not part of the dub episode, and thus don't belong under the dub title.

This was explained already in edit summaries, which you should have read (and responded to on a talk page, if you disagree) instead of simply redoing your edit repeatedly. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 02:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)