513
edits
User talk:Ataro/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→{{p|Keldeo}}: +++
(→{{p|Keldeo}}: well) |
(→{{p|Keldeo}}: +++) |
||
| Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
Well, I haven't read the Three Musketeers, though this does make me want to, but I think Keldeo is part of the other 4, they all have the same special ability and [[Sacred Sword (move)|signature move]] (though Keldeo one level later), so I wouldn't call them a trio. --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 22:37, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | Well, I haven't read the Three Musketeers, though this does make me want to, but I think Keldeo is part of the other 4, they all have the same special ability and [[Sacred Sword (move)|signature move]] (though Keldeo one level later), so I wouldn't call them a trio. --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 22:37, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Yes but in the story he isn't really counted as one (hence the three musketeers) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | : Yes but in the story he isn't really counted as one (hence the three musketeers) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: No one's arguing against the basis and inspiration being the Three Musketeers, but I'm saying for the sake of {{pkm}} it's part of the set. I think it's awkward just leaving it out like that. In the other cases of related {{pkm}} in [[Legendary trio]] it's the [[trio master|leader]] who's excluded, but Keldeo left out just leaves him as a legendary, non-leader, seemingly oxymoronically unimportant (but of course he is because he's a legendary) all alone, it's just wrong. They should either all be there (which is wrong because there 4, not 3) or none of them should - "All for one, and one for all". --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 23:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | :: No one's arguing against the basis and inspiration being the Three Musketeers, but I'm saying for the sake of {{pkm}} it's part of the set. I think it's awkward just leaving it out like that. In the other cases of related {{pkm}} in [[Legendary trio]] it's the [[trio master|leader]] who's excluded (which if you take the reference strongly would be wrong if he's an original member of the bunch), but Keldeo left out just leaves him as a legendary, non-leader, seemingly oxymoronically unimportant (but of course he is because he's a legendary) all alone, it's just wrong, like he's not cool enough because he's based on d'Artagnan. They should either all be there (which is wrong because there 4, not 3) or none of them should - "All for one, and one for all". --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 23:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | ||