User talk:Airbeats: Difference between revisions

Line 43: Line 43:


== Images ==
== Images ==
Regarding your images for Brock and Misty, I, the head of Project Anime, personally feel they aren't needed. So if you would not continue to re-add them I will appreciative. Also, when your edits are reverted, you shouldn't immediately redo the edit. Thanks. --[[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 23:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
My Misty pulling Brock's ear picture isn't needed, but the Max pulling Brock's ear is? Why would anyone prefer Max doing it than Misty? which looked better than the reverted one, it's just stupid WHY have users make accounts then if they can't DO ANYTHING? You should wise up when it comes to tastes. [[User:Airbeats|Airbeats]] ([[User talk:Airbeats|talk]]) 02:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
:Please watch how you speak to admins around here. I don't take kindly to my decisions being referred to as "stupid" nor to I appreciate to be told to "wise up". Review the {{bp|Code of Conduct}}.
:Also, you are allowed to edit anything you want but mind the notice at the bottom of the page before you save. "Please note that all contributions to Bulbapedia may be '''edited, altered, or removed by other contributors.'''"
:As for your images, they were reverted for graininess. The ones we have are of high quality. Having Misty in it doesn't automatically make it better. --[[Tracey Sketchit|<span style="color:#33CC66;">'''ケンジ'''</span>]][[User talk:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#6600CC;">'''の'''</span>]][[User:Kenji-girl|<span style="color:#FF00CC;">'''ガール'''</span>]] 03:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Those pictures don't look like high quality at all. The Misty pulling Brock's ear was just fine and better than having Max do it. The sensational sisters picture I put was infinitely better than the reverted one. GRAININESS? I can't believe you're honestly telling me that when I compare mine to yours. I don't see the HD pictures you're talking about because they're truly not. The reverted ones looks bad. And don't imply that I said it was infinitely better just because Misty was in it. Full stop. It's clearly obvious users can't change, edit or do ANYTHING around here without it being automatically reverted. It's evident how other users have complained about it as well. Add that as a foot-note when users want to sign up. [[User:Airbeats|Airbeats]] ([[User talk:Airbeats|talk]]) 15:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
:Users are always allowed to edit. But being able to edit =/= adding/changing whatever you want. We have rules, guidelines, and standards that you have to follow. If you can't follow them, yes, of course you get reverted. As for your comment towards me, I found ''that'' rude and disrespectful. Please take a look at it again. [http://dl.dropbox.com/u/61707450/oe6kqwa07j54t1kylgu4p78n8dxtjea.png Your image] is blurry (possibly from an online stream?), and grainy due to its past life as a JPG. [http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/b/b1/Misty_AG.png Our current image] is clear, focused, and has no JPG definition because it's always been a PNG. Yet you dare call me a liar. As for the Sensational sisters, the key thing about ours is it's full body. Yeah it's blurry when you view it at full size, but wouldn't it be more constructive to post a cleaner version of the image instead of upload a new one which only shows their faces? Not to mention the color is distorted since it's from a video screen. Please try to calm down, and realize when you're wrong. <sup>[[Typhlosion (Pokémon)|<span style="color:#C00;">★</span>]]</sup>[[User:Jo The Marten|<span style="color:#C00;">Jo the Marten</span>]]<sup>[[Flygon (Pokémon)|<span style="color:#C00;">★</span>]]</sup> [[User_Talk:Jo The Marten|<span style="color:#C00;">ಠ_ಠ</span>]][[Cilan (anime)|<span style="color:#90C870;">♥</span>]] 22:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
No, when users "edit" it gets reverted, I've seen the complaints. All I did was change some pictures to make them better. I didn't vandalize any writing or anything. I simply retaliated what YOU said to me that was "rude & disrespectful" when you respect me, you'll get the same in return. Haven't you ever heard that in your life? my gosh. My pictures looked better and were shown in a better light. While yours are little with poor quality. Yet you dare say mine are blurry & grotesque. I'm not wrong, you are. & always will be. [[User:Airbeats|Airbeats]] ([[User talk:Airbeats|talk]]) 02:11, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


:Regardless of how you feel about the situation between yourself and Jo the Marten, your attitude regarding the matter is unacceptable. Jo was not only making correct and civil points that you refused to acknowledge, but you accused ''her'' of being "rude and disrespectful" where-as it is clearly ''you'' that have crossed this line. Your attitude in this subject, and overall, has been less than acceptable and I highly advise you to be more open to constructive criticism and don't yell at the people trying to help you. Your images were definitely below our standards of quality, but you argued they weren't. We are all working together to make the site the best it can be. We would have no reason to lie and degrade your photo if it was better. It isn't about you, it's about the site. -- '''[[User:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">MAG</span>]][[Special:Contributions/MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#696969;">NE</span>]][[User talk:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">DETH</span>]]''' 03:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
:Regardless of how you feel about the situation between yourself and Jo the Marten, your attitude regarding the matter is unacceptable. Jo was not only making correct and civil points that you refused to acknowledge, but you accused ''her'' of being "rude and disrespectful" where-as it is clearly ''you'' that have crossed this line. Your attitude in this subject, and overall, has been less than acceptable and I highly advise you to be more open to constructive criticism and don't yell at the people trying to help you. Your images were definitely below our standards of quality, but you argued they weren't. We are all working together to make the site the best it can be. We would have no reason to lie and degrade your photo if it was better. It isn't about you, it's about the site. -- '''[[User:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">MAG</span>]][[Special:Contributions/MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#696969;">NE</span>]][[User talk:MAGNEDETH|<span style="color:#000033;">DETH</span>]]''' 03:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


His points were not correct & civil, they were incorrect & uncivil. I highly advise you not to intervene in conversations because you're messing up my page. Fact of the matter is, don't degrade my pictures. Instead of using encouraging advice you said my pictures were egregious and that's officially pulling the trigger. Who's yelling? I'm not yelling. I'll keep arguing that they aren't. Me more open to constructive criticism? you're the one who should be more open to it STOP saying it's just me. This site is obviously not better if everything keeps being reverted. Something that should really be added as a foot-note when users wanna sign up here.[[User:Airbeats|Airbeats]] ([[User talk:Airbeats|talk]]) 03:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
His points were not correct & civil, they were incorrect & uncivil. I highly advise you not to intervene in conversations because you're messing up my page. Fact of the matter is, don't degrade my pictures. Instead of using encouraging advice you said my pictures were egregious and that's officially pulling the trigger. Who's yelling? I'm not yelling. I'll keep arguing that they aren't. Me more open to constructive criticism? you're the one who should be more open to it STOP saying it's just me. This site is obviously not better if everything keeps being reverted. Something that should really be added as a foot-note when users wanna sign up here.[[User:Airbeats|Airbeats]] ([[User talk:Airbeats|talk]]) 03:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
52

edits