11,872
edits
User talk:Abcboy/Archive 5: Difference between revisions
→Your opinion
Nescientist (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 642: | Line 642: | ||
:#We know a lot of the Pokémon had codenames and even different names entirely. That particular case seems more like a typo to me, honestly. | :#We know a lot of the Pokémon had codenames and even different names entirely. That particular case seems more like a typo to me, honestly. | ||
:#Parallelism in a list of other section links using DL, perhaps; in general the plain link for cases like that is much clearer IMO. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 15:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC) | :#Parallelism in a list of other section links using DL, perhaps; in general the plain link for cases like that is much clearer IMO. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 15:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
::#So, what I'm reading is the first alternative wouldn't last too long, and also that there's no conflict if sections on the same page (like it:Poké Ball) are the interwiki target of multiple, distinct pages, is that correct? (If so, out of curiosity, where would Bulbabot's Italian counterpart link back to, if at all, given there wasn't already a link to en:Poké Ball?) What about the second alternative vs. the third? | |||
::#Are you talking about Generation I Japanese names that predate the release of Red and Green? If so, can you point me somewhere? I think I never heard that, even less saw a list. It's very obvious for Gen II by the Spaceworld demo, but for Generation I (..and I'm about to look for some helixchamber articles again to see if I'm mistaken), weren't the names often fixed before the designs??? (Since that Nishida site was first captured in Jan 1998, yes, スピア could easily just be a typo.) | |||
::#Alright, thanks. (Not sure what exact parallelism you mean, though.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 16:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC) | |||