11,900
edits
User talk:Abcboy/Archive 6: Difference between revisions
→Rowlet/my talk page: new section
m (Reverted edits by Diaper Dan (talk) to last revision by Abcboy) |
Nescientist (talk | contribs) (→Rowlet/my talk page: new section) |
||
| Line 369: | Line 369: | ||
I don't know if this is the right person to talk to, but I have noticed that our menu sprites are not all the same shape. I know that this is due to Gen 8 expanding them to 68x56. Bulbapedia is using the old sprites for the first 809 Pokemon and is using the 68x56 sprites for Gen 8 Pokemon. I found the site https://msikma.github.io/pokesprite/overview/dex-gen8.html which has all the updated Gen 8 menu sprites in the correct size. Can we update the current menu sprites to all be the same size? The site also has shiny menu sprites but those are fan-made so just ignore them. Thanks {{unsigned|Hero231}} | I don't know if this is the right person to talk to, but I have noticed that our menu sprites are not all the same shape. I know that this is due to Gen 8 expanding them to 68x56. Bulbapedia is using the old sprites for the first 809 Pokemon and is using the 68x56 sprites for Gen 8 Pokemon. I found the site https://msikma.github.io/pokesprite/overview/dex-gen8.html which has all the updated Gen 8 menu sprites in the correct size. Can we update the current menu sprites to all be the same size? The site also has shiny menu sprites but those are fan-made so just ignore them. Thanks {{unsigned|Hero231}} | ||
:We already have these images, we are currently in the process of upgrading old templates to support the new size sprites before updating them. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 17:34, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | :We already have these images, we are currently in the process of upgrading old templates to support the new size sprites before updating them. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 17:34, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
== Rowlet/my talk page == | |||
I'm sorry to bother you, but we have a situation that is oh so familiar. (It's even Rowlet again, maybe you should consider just banning Rowlet trivia sections..) Could you have a look at the case, please? | |||
I was under the impression that the [[Bulbapedia:Blocking policy#Edit/revert wars|edit warring policy]] generally applies to staff as well? I mean, if ForceFire is going this route when I'm building bridges, could you give them an edit warring warning or something? I may be biased, but seriously, I'm not under the impression that it's me who is unwilling to talk. I'm particularly concerned about ForceFire's final revert and the following page protection, which certainly smells like pulling rank in my opinion. | |||
As for the content level, maybe there's a chance I'm getting my point across to ForceFire (and even a minuscule chance it's vice-versa), but there's certainly a chance I won't. So, as I said, I don't really care if it ultimately stays, but I can't help but point out when the reasoning for removing it just doesn't make sense. In any way, going forward I request that it's not ForceFire alone who makes that decision based on that logic. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 14:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC) | |||