Talk:Type/Type chart: Difference between revisions

Talk:Type/Type chart (view source)

Revision as of 21:33, 10 April 2016

18 bytes added , 10 April 2016

m

→‎Outdated type charts

Poikins

424

edits

Revision as of 21:33, 10 April 2016 (view source) Poikins (talk \| contribs) (→‎Outdated type charts: new section)		Revision as of 21:33, 10 April 2016 (view source) Poikins (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Outdated type charts) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Outdated type charts ==		== Outdated type charts ==

	As someone who likes to go back and play Generations I (before Dark and Steel were added) and II-V (before Fairy was added), I believe those "previous type charts" should be added to ~~this page~~, instead of on their own page referenced below the current chart. The "Type/Type_chart" page is considered Incomplete, anyway. Why was this separated? Can we put it back on [[Type chart]] so it can be more easily accessed? (I've also posted this on [[Type chart]]'s Talk page) - [[User:Poikins\|<span style="color:#fc880d">'''poi'''</span>]][[User talk:Poikins\|<span style="color:#ff3333">'''kins'''</span>]] 21:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)		As someone who likes to go back and play Generations I (before Dark and Steel were added) and II-V (before Fairy was added), I believe those "previous type charts" should be added to [[Type chart]], instead of on their own page referenced below the current chart on that oage. The "Type/Type_chart" page is considered Incomplete, anyway. Why was this separated? Can we put it back on [[Type chart]] so it can be more easily accessed? (I've also posted this on [[Type chart]]'s Talk page) - [[User:Poikins\|<span style="color:#fc880d">'''poi'''</span>]][[User talk:Poikins\|<span style="color:#ff3333">'''kins'''</span>]] 21:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)