1,462
edits
Talk:Trio master: Difference between revisions
→Addressing Deletion
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 483: | Line 483: | ||
The previous discussion about "resolving the trio master issue" by @Jacob9594 has clearly stated two alternatives to solve this issue. And I, strongly, vehemently oppose the deletion of this article. I do agree with @landfish7 that we need a new page that highlights the relationship among different legendary pokemon groups and mythicals, but deleting this article would not really serve any purpose. We would need articles that link to the parent article about legendary pokemon relationships that describe all the different relationships in detail, unless we decide to put all of the information into one overcomplicated page of gargantuan proportions. By now we have duos, trios, qaurtets, quintets, and who knows, maybe even more such groups will evolve in the future. Instead of deletion, I'd like to propose this article be modified to denote the dominant legendary among groups, and the trio master serve as a category among those who constitute a trio. | The previous discussion about "resolving the trio master issue" by @Jacob9594 has clearly stated two alternatives to solve this issue. And I, strongly, vehemently oppose the deletion of this article. I do agree with @landfish7 that we need a new page that highlights the relationship among different legendary pokemon groups and mythicals, but deleting this article would not really serve any purpose. We would need articles that link to the parent article about legendary pokemon relationships that describe all the different relationships in detail, unless we decide to put all of the information into one overcomplicated page of gargantuan proportions. By now we have duos, trios, qaurtets, quintets, and who knows, maybe even more such groups will evolve in the future. Instead of deletion, I'd like to propose this article be modified to denote the dominant legendary among groups, and the trio master serve as a category among those who constitute a trio. | ||
Deleting an article about a well established concept is harmful towards classification, and I'd also like everyone to go read up @Jacob9594's discussion on the same topic previous to this conversation. [[User:Lucifer Lawliet|Lucifer Lawliet]] ([[User talk:Lucifer Lawliet|talk]]) 07:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC) | Deleting an article about a well established concept is harmful towards classification, and I'd also like everyone to go read up @Jacob9594's discussion on the same topic previous to this conversation. [[User:Lucifer Lawliet|Lucifer Lawliet]] ([[User talk:Lucifer Lawliet|talk]]) 07:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
:The concept is not "well-established", Lugia is only the "trio master" in the anime, which we have decided to stop focusing on, Ho-Oh created the legendary beasts, but has no active involvement in their activities. The "overseeing" part of the definition is violated three times versus being enforced four times. This page has no info that isn't on others and its deletion would do no harm. It's pure fanon.--[[User:MissDelibirda|MissDelibirda]] ([[User talk:MissDelibirda|talk]]) 17:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC) | |||