546
edits
Talk:Shiny Pokémon/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Talk:Shiny Pokémon/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 22:00, 21 November 2011
, 21 November 2011no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 577: | Line 577: | ||
The [[My Pokémon Ranch ]] page says this: "All of these Pokémon will have the OT Hayley (English) or ユカリ (Japanese) and the Trainer ID number 01000. Note that all of the Pokémon with specific natures cannot have a different nature, gender, and ability and they cannot be shiny." But this page says Ranch Mew can be shiny, which is correct?[[User:Jmvb|Jmvb]] 20:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | The [[My Pokémon Ranch ]] page says this: "All of these Pokémon will have the OT Hayley (English) or ユカリ (Japanese) and the Trainer ID number 01000. Note that all of the Pokémon with specific natures cannot have a different nature, gender, and ability and they cannot be shiny." But this page says Ranch Mew can be shiny, which is correct?[[User:Jmvb|Jmvb]] 20:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
:The Mew doesn't have a specific nature, neither does the Phione. So there's no contradictory information. <small>- ''unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])'' </small> 21:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | :The Mew doesn't have a specific nature, neither does the Phione. So there's no contradictory information. <small>- ''unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])'' </small> 21:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
::ah ok I misread. It seems odd that there isn't a shiny check on the Mew and Phione, has this been confirmed? | |||