Talk:Sevii Islands: Difference between revisions

→‎Why?: Please don't reply to comments well over 6 months old. This section has already been resolved, as you have already noted.
(→‎Why?: Please don't reply to comments well over 6 months old. This section has already been resolved, as you have already noted.)
Line 117: Line 117:
Can someone please tell me why we consider this a region? I never really understood why [[User:Iml908|Iml908]] 22:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Can someone please tell me why we consider this a region? I never really understood why [[User:Iml908|Iml908]] 22:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
:Why wouldn't we consider it a region? It is a large topographical area containing many settlements, landmarks, and routes. That's pretty much the definition of a region. Not to mention that it isn't really part of any other region. --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] [[User talk:AndyPKMN|(talk)]] 22:49, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
:Why wouldn't we consider it a region? It is a large topographical area containing many settlements, landmarks, and routes. That's pretty much the definition of a region. Not to mention that it isn't really part of any other region. --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] [[User talk:AndyPKMN|(talk)]] 22:49, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
:: Wouldn't this be a part of Kanto it says so right in Geography section "The nine Sevii Islands are a part of the Kanto region".


== Origin of name.  ==
== Origin of name.  ==
40,875

edits