User:Riox-Ibui/Eevee_(anime)
No offence but I feel User:Riox-Ibui/Eevee_(anime) would be a better page to use for Lana's Eevee--BigDocFan (talk) 09:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 11:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Move
Shouldn't the page be moved to match Eevee's nickname? --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 11:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- I say we wait until we hear Lana use that nickname in the next episode Eevee appears in. That way we'll see for sure if it'll be a common name or not. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 11:05, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Meh. I doubt it'll change. Why would she have given it a name if it wasn't going to stick? --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 11:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- I see no reason not to change it. Nothing indicates it won't be used again, and it's not like it's shown up so much that there'd be a ton of links to revert if it stops using the name. Ataro (talk) 12:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- We should never fall victim to assumptions made in one episode. We should always wait until the name is used again. Why was this article renamed so soon? GrammarFreak01 (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Because they made a whole point about the nickname in the episode? Lana nicknames it before she even catches it, indicating she is already attached to it, with Mallow remarking you usually catch a Pokémon first and then nickname it. Besides that, she specifically nicknames it Nagisa, meaning "marin" or "shore" because it loves the sea so much. It's a specific nickname related to her specialty type. Lastly, when she introduces Eevee to her family she specifically introduces it as Nagisa. With all this I really don't see any reason to wait until she calls it Nagisa again in a future episode. It's clear that's its name now and what Lana will call it. ☼ BlazingFist ☼ 00:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- Still disagree. We should've waited for the next episode for confirmation. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 01:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- When a Pokémon learns a new move in an episode, we don't wait till the next episode where it uses the moves before adding it to a page to see if it "really" learned the move. I don't see what the difference is with a nickname, especially one that was mentioned multiple times throughout the episode and was specifically emphasized on through dialogue and context. ☼ BlazingFist ☼ 01:35, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- But nicknames are completely different from moves. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 03:09, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- When a Pokémon learns a new move in an episode, we don't wait till the next episode where it uses the moves before adding it to a page to see if it "really" learned the move. I don't see what the difference is with a nickname, especially one that was mentioned multiple times throughout the episode and was specifically emphasized on through dialogue and context. ☼ BlazingFist ☼ 01:35, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- Still disagree. We should've waited for the next episode for confirmation. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 01:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- Because they made a whole point about the nickname in the episode? Lana nicknames it before she even catches it, indicating she is already attached to it, with Mallow remarking you usually catch a Pokémon first and then nickname it. Besides that, she specifically nicknames it Nagisa, meaning "marin" or "shore" because it loves the sea so much. It's a specific nickname related to her specialty type. Lastly, when she introduces Eevee to her family she specifically introduces it as Nagisa. With all this I really don't see any reason to wait until she calls it Nagisa again in a future episode. It's clear that's its name now and what Lana will call it. ☼ BlazingFist ☼ 00:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- We should never fall victim to assumptions made in one episode. We should always wait until the name is used again. Why was this article renamed so soon? GrammarFreak01 (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- I see no reason not to change it. Nothing indicates it won't be used again, and it's not like it's shown up so much that there'd be a ton of links to revert if it stops using the name. Ataro (talk) 12:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Meh. I doubt it'll change. Why would she have given it a name if it wasn't going to stick? --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 11:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Tackle
As there seems to be some confusion over Nagisa using Tackle, shall we agree to keep it removed for now until we have confirmation through captions or subtitles?--BigDocFan (talk) 14:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- There is? There shouldn't be at all. The character profile says it uses Tackle on people and Pokemon. It says Taiatari (Tackle/Body Blow), not it attacks people, otherwise it would say something like Kogeki. Playerking95 (talk) 14:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Nagisa's Gender
The only true "evidence" I have of Nagisa's gender, is when Kiawe asks Lana, "This guy and Ashimari?", referring to Nagisa. However, this is from the Japanese version with English subtitles, so he may have actually said something a bit different. Also, Kiawe probably wouldn't know its gender yet. Until further evidence, I'm 55% sure that it's a male, but I have no idea... Josiahsays (talk) 4:19 P.M. 1/16/2019 (EST)
- Subs are not reliable. Subs are NEVER reliable. They are fan made and prone for errors.--ForceFire 04:46, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, he's right. The true evidence is the tail since only male Eevee has a zigzag pattern at the end of his tail. Herowho (talk) 10:46 P.M. 6/21/2019 (EST)
- I don't buy that either because it takes years for gender differences to show up in the anime with any regularity. It took years after Gen 4 for Pikachu's gender difference to be shown in the anime, and the Pink Butterfree was commonly depicted with male wings until the I choose you movie. It's really best to wait for actual evidence within the anime itself rather then outside sources like subs or how the games depict something. PDL (talk) 04:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- Only the Partner Eevee has gender differences. Sandy may be a reference to it, but that doesn't confirm anything. Ataro (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- I thought it was based on the Partner Eevee though. It never explicitly talks about it, but it was mentioned that Sandy came from a different region, (possibly Kanto) and the Partner Eevee has an available haircut that somewhat resembles the one that Lana gives it after she catches it. I am not saying that its confirmed male because its tail has the zigzag pattern, I'm just putting this out there. -Josiahsays (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Only the Partner Eevee has gender differences. Sandy may be a reference to it, but that doesn't confirm anything. Ataro (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- I don't buy that either because it takes years for gender differences to show up in the anime with any regularity. It took years after Gen 4 for Pikachu's gender difference to be shown in the anime, and the Pink Butterfree was commonly depicted with male wings until the I choose you movie. It's really best to wait for actual evidence within the anime itself rather then outside sources like subs or how the games depict something. PDL (talk) 04:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, he's right. The true evidence is the tail since only male Eevee has a zigzag pattern at the end of his tail. Herowho (talk) 10:46 P.M. 6/21/2019 (EST)
Is this trivia worthy?
Is it worth mentioning that Sandy is the only Eevee belonging to one of Ash's friends that hasn't evolved? --PKMNAdventurer (talk) 19:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
gender differences
This pokémon was caught before gender differences applied to Eevee, so gender differences say nothing. Pikachu210 (talk) 08:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)