Talk:Samiya: Difference between revisions

536 bytes added ,  13 September 2015
(New page: "Even though Samiya is a place, it still owned Pokémon in the Pokémon Trading Card Game." I dunno. It doesn't seem that odd when you take the "Samiya's Buizel" to mean "the Buizel from ...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


I dunno. It doesn't seem that odd when you take the "Samiya's Buizel" to mean "the Buizel from Samiya". It's like saying I'm Bulbapedia's TTEchidna. I know Bulbapedia doesn't own me... '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 06:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I dunno. It doesn't seem that odd when you take the "Samiya's Buizel" to mean "the Buizel from Samiya". It's like saying I'm Bulbapedia's TTEchidna. I know Bulbapedia doesn't own me... '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 06:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
:The sentence needs to be reworded. It really sounds stupid. A place can't own any Pokémon (even in the Pokemon World it is impossible). That sentence is a result of misunderstanding of "no" (just like "Glacidea's Flower") and it needs to be reworded. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 07:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
== On the origin section of TCG cards... ==
Many of them are incomplete, if they exist at all. Somebody needs to fix them. [[User:Trainer Yusuf|Trainer Yusuf]] ([[User talk:Trainer Yusuf|talk]]) 11:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
1,327

edits