16
edits
Talk:Pokémon breeding: Difference between revisions
→Need Explaination
| Line 199: | Line 199: | ||
:::@Star - Sibling breeding is allowed, the mechanics that prevent Parent-child breeding are related to IVs (or DV, as they were caled back then) and there is no relation on opposite sex siblings' IVs in GSC. | :::@Star - Sibling breeding is allowed, the mechanics that prevent Parent-child breeding are related to IVs (or DV, as they were caled back then) and there is no relation on opposite sex siblings' IVs in GSC. | ||
:::@It does, in the "Inheriting stats" section. [[User:Mr. Charlie|<font color="#000000">'''Mr. Charlie'''</font>]]<small>([[User_Talk:Mr. Charlie|<font color="#0000FF">''TalkToMe''</font>]])</small> 15:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | :::@It does, in the "Inheriting stats" section. [[User:Mr. Charlie|<font color="#000000">'''Mr. Charlie'''</font>]]<small>([[User_Talk:Mr. Charlie|<font color="#0000FF">''TalkToMe''</font>]])</small> 15:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Actually, there is debate among scientific circles as to the validity of superstitions that inbreeding causes developmental defects. While more recent articles focus more on how this does lead to homozygosity and an increase in recessive alleles, an article from the Dept of Biostatistics study concludes that, "No significant differences existed in the incidence of congenital anomalies among offspring between the consanguineous and non-consanguineous marriages in the rural or in the urban area." (Rao and Inbaraj, 1980). This doesn't necessarily write out its nature as a taboo subject in non-scholarly circles, but please enjoy just one of many scholarly articles on the subject, this one by the Dept of Biostatistics found in the Journal of Medical Genetics: [http://jmg.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/17/1/27 Inbreeding effects on fetal growth and development] | ::Actually, there is debate among scientific circles as to the validity of superstitions that inbreeding causes developmental defects. While more recent articles focus more on how this does lead to homozygosity and an increase in recessive alleles, an article from the Dept of Biostatistics study concludes that, "No significant differences existed in the incidence of congenital anomalies among offspring between the consanguineous and non-consanguineous marriages in the rural or in the urban area." (Rao and Inbaraj, 1980). This doesn't necessarily write out its nature as a taboo subject in non-scholarly circles, but please enjoy just one of many scholarly articles on the subject, this one by the Dept of Biostatistics found in the Journal of Medical Genetics: [http://jmg.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/17/1/27 Inbreeding effects on fetal growth and development] I admit it's an older article, but newer articles tend to focus on studied genetic changes other than "defects". | ||
== Tauros and Miltank again == | == Tauros and Miltank again == | ||