Talk:Normal (type): Difference between revisions

Talk:Normal (type) (view source)

Revision as of 14:13, 12 June 2016

5,254 bytes added , 12 June 2016

m

→‎Boomburst

Carmenstar97

24,122

edits

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 If we add in Water(type) that there has been a dual-type Water/Flying Pokemon in every Generation in Trivia section,so we to do the same here with Normal/Flying [[User:Rajjoaby|Rajjoaby]] ([[User talk:Rajjoaby|talk]]) 19:14, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
+"The Normal and Electric types have the fewest weaknesses, with just one." ground and fighting false ([[User talk:Rodriguezjames55|talk]])
 == Considering the leak... ==
@@ Line 134: / Line 136: @@
 Officialnintendomagazine.com says that Noiven learns a new Normal move called Boomburst' "which emits an explosive sound wave that attacks all surrounding Pokemon with the resulting energy. But beware, Boomburst will also strike any nearby allies."[[User:Yamitora1|Yamitora1]] ([[User talk:Yamitora1|talk]]) 21:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
+== Litleo ==
+"Almost all Normal-type Pokémon with two types are Normal/Flying, with the notable exceptions of Girafarig and Meloetta's Aria Forme (Normal/Psychic), Bibarel (Normal/Water), Deerling and Sawsbuck (Normal/Grass), Meloetta's Pirouette Forme (Normal/Fighting), and Helioptile (Electric/Normal)."
+Can someone add "Litleo (Fire/Normal)"? [[User:Vienna Waltz|Vienna Waltz]] ([[User talk:Vienna Waltz|talk]]) 05:55, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
+==Untitled==
+Jigglypuff should be added to the group too since it will gain fairy as a secondary type from pokémon X/Y. [[User:Male supremo|Male supremo]] ([[User talk:Male supremo|talk]]) 12:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
+== About dual type Normal pokemon ==
+Currently, the characteristics section points out how the majority of dual type normal pokemon are part flying. It then lists all the exceptions, which as of now is a fair amount. I understand why this was notable prior to Gen V when the only two exceptions were Girafarig and Bibarel, but not it seems unnecessary. Given that there are likely to be even more dual type normal pokemon come October, wouldn't it better to move to this to the trivia section?[[User:ElementX|ElementX]] ([[User talk:ElementX|talk]]) 13:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
+== Move request ==
+Can anyone add the move {{m|Play Nice}} because it is the only Normal-type move missing from the list of Normal-type moves? [[User:Cinday123|<span style="color:pink">Cinday123</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Cinday123|<span style="color:lightblue">Talk</span>]])''</small> 23:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
+:People, if we don't add the move {{m|Play Nice}} for too long, the moves section will never be completed, can anyone edit this with the addition? [[User:Cinday123|<span style="color:pink">Cinday123</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Cinday123|<span style="color:lightblue">Talk</span>]])''</small> 01:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
+::If you're not going to do it yourself, be patient and someone will get it eventually, but I urge you to try doing it yourself. It's really not that hard, and it'll give you practice understanding templates. Just follow the format the other moves are in, and put in the information given on the {{m|Play Nice}} page. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 02:15, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
+== Introduction of Normal-Type moves Trivia ==
+According to the little asterisk in the trivia section beside the number of moves introduced in Gen I, it mentions that it includes those that have changed type. There's nothing wrong with that, but it says it includes Moonlight, Charm, and Sweet Kiss, all of which weren't originally from Gen I. According to the moves' pages, they were all introduced in Gen II. Could someone double check that information and correct it if the trivia on this page is wrong? I apologize if I've misunderstood the information in the trivia section, but I just wanted to check on that. Please And thank you. [[User:Shadowkat777|Shadowkat777]] ([[User talk:Shadowkat777|talk]]) 20:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
+==Guillotine?==
+Guillotine should have 30% accuracy, not -%. It is a One-hit-KO move, and its page even says 30% accuracy. [[User: Slaking Kong|SlakingKong]] 07:04, 8 April 2015 (EST)
+:Um, no. Its page actually says that its accuracy is —%, and that its accuracy was 30% only in Gen I.--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 11:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
+== We Should Mention Ion Deluge ==
+How to do so, though? We have an Interacting with Normal Type section in Abilities, should we add one in Moves too? [[User:ArtistKyurem|ArtistKyurem]] ([[User talk:ArtistKyurem|talk]]) 21:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
+== What does it mean by "non-neutral type relations"? ==
+"The Normal type has the fewest non-neutral type relations, with only four." If it means what I think it does, then I'm only counting 3: Rock, Steel and Ghost. [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 02:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
+:You forgot Fighting, since every other type is neutral to normal except ghost (immune), fighting (super-effective against normal), rock and steel (both resists normal).[[User:Animaltamer7|Animaltamer7]]02:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
+::Oh, so it means both ways, huh? Thanks. [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 02:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
+== Boomburst ==
+The table says that Boomburst affects any adjacent Pokémon, but on the Boomburst article it says that it hits all adjacent Pokémon. [[User:Ac2k|Ac2k]] ([[User talk:Ac2k|talk]]) 12:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
+:Fixed; Boomburst hits all adjacent Pokémon. Thanks for pointing it out. --[[User:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#95EB5C">Carmen<small>★</small></span>]] <small>''[[User talk:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#FEBEE8">(Talk |</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#A6DAFC">contribs)</span>]]''</small> 14:13, 12 June 2016 (UTC)