Table formatting
Can we make the tables look like this?
| Species | Location | Level | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sudowoodo | Route 36 | 20 | Requires SquirtBottle |
I'm pretty sure locations and levels are more relevant than types for this article. Also it's much easier to add missing Pokemon to tables that are formatted like this. sumwun (talk, contribs) 19:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, I like that idea. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- sumwun - Thanks for improving the tables. I think we can agree that having this list with added details is better than before. Please keep up the good work.
- However, I think the previous style (a simple table with images and no text) was nice too. So I disagree with you saying it was bad in the edit summary. As in, you're free to think the previous style was bad in your opinion, but my opinion is different.
- When I reverted that earlier revision, it was just a small incomplete Emerald table with 2 Pokémon. As you know, the information was not even lost; it was kept in the old revision in case you would like to use it and keep making tables using that style.
- I'm still not a big fan of having an inconsistent style like we still have now, but about half of the tables are converted so I guess we can keep them until all the work can be done. I added a template requesting the work to be finished when possible. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- Pitched in with new tables for Gen I and FRLG. I may make more tables tomorrow if I find the time. --AmbientDinosaur (talk) 03:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)