35
edits
Talk:List of Pokémon with branched evolutions: Difference between revisions
Talk:List of Pokémon with branched evolutions (view source)
Revision as of 01:25, 28 June 2011
, 28 June 2011→Nincada
m (→Nincada) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Well, OK.--[[User:Sanky|Sanky]] 14:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | Well, OK.--[[User:Sanky|Sanky]] 14:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah. It's one of those weird things, but you can't really say that it's an unrelated yet similar Pokémon (as is the case with Plusle and Minun), despite the fact that it doesn't directly result from the induction of evolution in Nincada, like both Gardevoir and Gallade are for Kirlia. If there were more Pokémon like it, we'd have some other precedent, but it's likely there'll be no more like this (well, there haven't been yet)... so we go with the TCG's classification of it as a brancher. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">TTE</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#0000FF">chidna</span>]]''' 20:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | :Yeah. It's one of those weird things, but you can't really say that it's an unrelated yet similar Pokémon (as is the case with Plusle and Minun), despite the fact that it doesn't directly result from the induction of evolution in Nincada, like both Gardevoir and Gallade are for Kirlia. If there were more Pokémon like it, we'd have some other precedent, but it's likely there'll be no more like this (well, there haven't been yet)... so we go with the TCG's classification of it as a brancher. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">TTE</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#0000FF">chidna</span>]]''' 20:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Just to clear it up, a branched evo is when you have to '''choose''' which evo to get, and with nincada, you get '''both''', so it is not a branch and therefore should not be put on the page. | |||