Talk:List of Pokémon that appear in every regional Pokédex: Difference between revisions

Talk:List of Pokémon that appear in every regional Pokédex (view source)

Revision as of 21:42, 7 June 2013

651 bytes added , 7 June 2013

→‎Should it be noted that NO Pokémon is in all regional dexes?

Pumpkinking0192

13,668

edits

Revision as of 19:57, 7 June 2013 (view source) TheBlazikenMaster (talk \| contribs) (→‎Should it be noted that NO Pokémon is in all regional dexes?: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:42, 7 June 2013 (view source) Pumpkinking0192 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Should it be noted that NO Pokémon is in all regional dexes?) Newer edit →
Line 106:		Line 106:

	Yeah, later games do extend the PokéDexes, but it doesn't change the fact that no Pokémon is in the regional dex of the first games the regional PokéDexes were in. [[User:TheBlazikenMaster\|TheBlazikenMaster]] ([[User talk:TheBlazikenMaster\|talk]]) 19:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)		Yeah, later games do extend the PokéDexes, but it doesn't change the fact that no Pokémon is in the regional dex of the first games the regional PokéDexes were in. [[User:TheBlazikenMaster\|TheBlazikenMaster]] ([[User talk:TheBlazikenMaster\|talk]]) 19:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
			:Added a note roughly to that effect in the lede. Obviously, this list relies on the unstated assumption that the original version (BW, DP, GSC) and expanded version (B2W2, Pt, HGSS) are the same Dex, which it sounds like you're disagreeing with. We all know that no Pokemon would be on this list if it counted every edition of every Dex separately, so I think for the purposes of this list, it's better to lump together original/expanded as different versions of the same Dex. Do you see what I mean? (I'm not sure if I'm explaining myself well.) [[User:Pumpkinking0192\|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192\|talk]]) 21:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)