1,301
edits
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
:::::::::I like this idea the best. Everyone else down for it? [[User:Torpoleon|Torpoleon]] ([[User talk:Torpoleon|talk]]) 20:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC) | :::::::::I like this idea the best. Everyone else down for it? [[User:Torpoleon|Torpoleon]] ([[User talk:Torpoleon|talk]]) 20:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::I'd prefer it that way as well[[User:PDL|PDL]] ([[User talk:PDL|talk]]) 23:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | ::::::::::I'd prefer it that way as well[[User:PDL|PDL]] ([[User talk:PDL|talk]]) 23:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Should it be noted that NO Pokémon is in all regional dexes? == | |||
I mean think about it, in Pokémon Black no Pokémon from previous generations were included in the regional dex of that game. | |||
Personally I think it should say something in the beginning of the article like that. | |||
Yeah, later games do extend the PokéDexes, but it doesn't change the fact that no Pokémon is in the regional dex of the first games the regional PokéDexes were in. [[User:TheBlazikenMaster|TheBlazikenMaster]] ([[User talk:TheBlazikenMaster|talk]]) 19:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC) |
edits