Talk:Legendary Pokémon: Difference between revisions

Talk:Legendary Pokémon (view source)

Revision as of 16:46, 18 March 2017

648 bytes added , 18 March 2017

m

→‎Anime evidence?

Dennou Zenshi

19,653

edits

Revision as of 16:40, 18 March 2017 (view source) LanceDrake286 (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Anime evidence?: My own typo) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:46, 18 March 2017 (view source) Dennou Zenshi (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Anime evidence?) Newer edit →
Line 546:		Line 546:

	:I'm fairly certain an official statement cannot be taken from a translated summary of something that happens in the anime. Do the summaries still call them legendary pokémon in Japanese? There's also the matter of the anime itself not calling them legendary, only a translation of a summary. [[User:LanceDrake286\|LanceDrake286]] ([[User talk:LanceDrake286\|talk]]) 16:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)		:I'm fairly certain an official statement cannot be taken from a translated summary of something that happens in the anime. Do the summaries still call them legendary pokémon in Japanese? There's also the matter of the anime itself not calling them legendary, only a translation of a summary. [[User:LanceDrake286\|LanceDrake286]] ([[User talk:LanceDrake286\|talk]]) 16:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
			::[http://imgur.com/eojk7UE The summary] indeed uses the Japanese word for Legendary Pokémon for Tapu Koko and it should be added to the "evidence for" section. Though I wouldn't say this is enough proof to start calling Tapus legendaries in Bulbapedia. It could be just anime writers or whoever wrote summary assuming they're legendaries wihout knowing for sure.--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi\|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi\|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 16:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)