4,626
edits
Talk:It's Super Effective (podcast): Difference between revisions
→Changes to the article: new section
(→Intro) |
(→Changes to the article: new section) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Who can we talk to about what needs to be done on behalf of ISE or Bulbapedia to resolve this? | Who can we talk to about what needs to be done on behalf of ISE or Bulbapedia to resolve this? | ||
[[User:GrimmDark|GrimmDark]] ([[User talk:GrimmDark|talk]]) | [[User:GrimmDark|GrimmDark]] ([[User talk:GrimmDark|talk]]) | ||
== Changes to the article == | |||
Okay, I took a look at the article and made some changes. The main problems were that it did read a little like an advertisement, and also felt like an infodump, with lots and lots of lists that were all but meaningless without context. So here's what I've done: | |||
*A new "Reception" section to deal with the accolades the podcast has achieved. This means that the blurb concerning its popularity is no longer right at the top, which makes the article feel less than an ad, and I've also restored the paragraph about awards, and put it here. Obviously if the podcast attracted any negative attention or controversy, this would also be the place for it. | |||
*The various lists of co-hosts have been placed with the staff, and made into sentences so that they don't stretch the page so much. | |||
*The website stuff has been hidden until the many items on the list can be elaborated upon. At the moment it's not really doing anything other than taking up space: these list items are meaningless without descriptions. | |||
*Some stuff has been reordered. The show's features really should be the first information presented. These could also do with some expansion. | |||
I considered getting rid of the in-jokes and the table of episode titles, but these can stay for now. However, there needs to be more actual information about the show and its content to counterbalance this. At the moment the in-jokes section is twice as long as the features section. This really shouldn't be the case. | |||
As it stands, I think the article is reasonably neutral and I've removed the POV tag. I hope this satisfies all concerned. [[User:Bikini Miltank|Bikini Miltank]] ([[User talk:Bikini Miltank|talk]]) 17:15, 14 July 2012 (UTC) | |||