153
edits
Talk:EP033: Difference between revisions
→Flame body?
In A Manica (talk | contribs) (→supposed trivia.: new section) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 07:28, 29 August 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 07:28, 29 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::: if ''you'' actually bothered to read instead of jumping the gun and looking illiterate, you would have realized that I clearly said "Although Ponyta cannot have Flame body in the games". Pokemon in the anime have always been able to bend the rules in this way and since I was mentioning that it was probably only a ''concept'' at the time doesn't mean they would have written it down "we have already given Ponyta a quality very similar to flame body - make it '''top priority''' to keep this consistent when we ''possibly'' introduce something like this to future games". This site ''loves'' assumptions (when made up by their own staff of coarse), just like Ash's/animes Ho-oh is stated to be both the gold colored one and the normal colored one is a perfect example of how I believe that something like this is also proof of future thoughts into the series. So why "this different colored Ho-oh points towards future Pokémon and growth of the series" (even so far as a specific Pokémon that apparently changes colors) and "this example of a pokemon quality (i.e. ability and specifically one which happens to act a lot like Flame Body) points towards a future mechanic" is soooo different that I have to be shunned eludes me -- [[User:D558|D558]] 09:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC) | :::: if ''you'' actually bothered to read instead of jumping the gun and looking illiterate, you would have realized that I clearly said "Although Ponyta cannot have Flame body in the games". Pokemon in the anime have always been able to bend the rules in this way and since I was mentioning that it was probably only a ''concept'' at the time doesn't mean they would have written it down "we have already given Ponyta a quality very similar to flame body - make it '''top priority''' to keep this consistent when we ''possibly'' introduce something like this to future games". This site ''loves'' assumptions (when made up by their own staff of coarse), just like Ash's/animes Ho-oh is stated to be both the gold colored one and the normal colored one is a perfect example of how I believe that something like this is also proof of future thoughts into the series. So why "this different colored Ho-oh points towards future Pokémon and growth of the series" (even so far as a specific Pokémon that apparently changes colors) and "this example of a pokemon quality (i.e. ability and specifically one which happens to act a lot like Flame Body) points towards a future mechanic" is soooo different that I have to be shunned eludes me -- [[User:D558|D558]] 09:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::Thanks to Dream world abilities Ataros only non-mentally challenged point is now worthless. Calls me a child while one of his "points" is be quiet, seriously... some people can't see logic in front of their face. I can, but I'm not a drone who follows the whims of the highly subjective material that liters this site when they pretend to be objective. Likely it will prove my point when I get warned/banned but Ateros arrogant statements likely went by unnoticed. Ponytas ability to control it's flames is similar to how sharpedos controlled rough skin. People think ahead (developers not anyone on this site), this is an early indication of things to come in the pokemon series, I'm not trying to say it was a blatant use of flame body but it is that pokemon are more then just types and moves. Pokemon didn't have natures till gen III but they had them from day one in the anime. I'm wasting logic here though. -- [[User:D558|D558]] 23:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Magikarp error == | == Magikarp error == | ||