7,644
edits
Talk:Cheating: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
No, No. NO Gameshark codes! We are an informitive wiki, NOT an on-line strategy guide! {{:User:Theryguy512/Sig}} 13:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | No, No. NO Gameshark codes! We are an informitive wiki, NOT an on-line strategy guide! {{:User:Theryguy512/Sig}} 13:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Firstly, what's not informative about listing codes? Secondly, how do you explain the 'game guides' category on Bulbapedia? --[[User:Malorie|Malorie]] 19:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | :Firstly, what's not informative about listing codes? Secondly, how do you explain the 'game guides' category on Bulbapedia? --[[User:Malorie|Malorie]] 19:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Codes completely ruin the point of playing the game! | ::Codes completely ruin the point of playing the game![[User:Pokemaniac102|<font color=#FF0000>Po</font><font color=#FFFF00>ke</font>]][[User talk:Pokemaniac102|<font color=#00FF00>Ma</font><font color=#00FFFF>ni</font><font color=#0000FF>ac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Pokemaniac102|<font color=#FF00FF>102</font>]] 19:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::And that's a neutral stance on things how? It'd be like someone saying a page for Scientology shouldn't be on Wikipedia because they think it's 'morally wrong'. Regardless of peoples view on it, the information should still be posted from a neutral stance. Besides, lets not forget about people who use codes to play the game a second time with a different experience, ie. having a different starting pokemon, or people who use codes to explore the games programming and such. --[[User:Malorie|Malorie]] 19:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | :::And that's a neutral stance on things how? It'd be like someone saying a page for Scientology shouldn't be on Wikipedia because they think it's 'morally wrong'. Regardless of peoples view on it, the information should still be posted from a neutral stance. Besides, lets not forget about people who use codes to play the game a second time with a different experience, ie. having a different starting pokemon, or people who use codes to explore the games programming and such. --[[User:Malorie|Malorie]] 19:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::And all I'm getting is that you want the codes. | ::::And all I'm getting is that you want the codes.[[User:Pokemaniac102|<font color=#FF0000>Po</font><font color=#FFFF00>ke</font>]][[User talk:Pokemaniac102|<font color=#00FF00>Ma</font><font color=#00FFFF>ni</font><font color=#0000FF>ac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Pokemaniac102|<font color=#FF00FF>102</font>]] 19:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::Also, someone did post them a few days ago. I erased them. | ::::Also, someone did post them a few days ago. I erased them.[[User:Pokemaniac102|<font color=#FF0000>Po</font><font color=#FFFF00>ke</font>]][[User talk:Pokemaniac102|<font color=#00FF00>Ma</font><font color=#00FFFF>ni</font><font color=#0000FF>ac</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Pokemaniac102|<font color=#FF00FF>102</font>]] 19:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::Yes, I want the codes to be listed on Bulbapedia, if that's what you mean. Isn't Bulbapedia designed to be a resource for all things Pokemon? Deleting pages of information, despite how factual and accurate it is, seems somewhat silly to me. If nothing else, I think at the very least, external links to such codes should exist. Blocking out an entire aspect of Pokemon because some users frown upon it (and, conversely, some people approve and encourage it), seems to defeat the point of having a wiki in the first place. --[[User:Malorie|Malorie]] 20:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)\ | :::::Yes, I want the codes to be listed on Bulbapedia, if that's what you mean. Isn't Bulbapedia designed to be a resource for all things Pokemon? Deleting pages of information, despite how factual and accurate it is, seems somewhat silly to me. If nothing else, I think at the very least, external links to such codes should exist. Blocking out an entire aspect of Pokemon because some users frown upon it (and, conversely, some people approve and encourage it), seems to defeat the point of having a wiki in the first place. --[[User:Malorie|Malorie]] 20:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)\ | ||
::::::You're not getting it, are you.. cheating is frowned upon here. We are not Wikipedia. We don't have anything on cheating because we don't allow it, hence why pages on GameShark codes and the like are deleted, mainly because they are a bunch of of 'unencyclopedic' bullsh*t. If you want cheating codes, go somewhere else. {{User:TinaTheKirlia/Sig}} 20:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | ::::::You're not getting it, are you.. cheating is frowned upon here. We are not Wikipedia. We don't have anything on cheating because we don't allow it, hence why pages on GameShark codes and the like are deleted, mainly because they are a bunch of of 'unencyclopedic' bullsh*t. If you want cheating codes, go somewhere else. {{User:TinaTheKirlia/Sig}} 20:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | ||