55
edits
Talk:Alola Route 11: Difference between revisions
→Commented out sections
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::::Some places also have different encounter rates per location (such as {{rt|1|Alola}} having different encounter rates for different patches of grass), so all of those have to be verified as well. --[[User:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#95EB5C">Carmen<small>★</small></span>]] <small>''[[User talk:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#FEBEE8">(Talk |</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#A6DAFC">contribs)</span>]]''</small> 04:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC) | ::::::Some places also have different encounter rates per location (such as {{rt|1|Alola}} having different encounter rates for different patches of grass), so all of those have to be verified as well. --[[User:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#95EB5C">Carmen<small>★</small></span>]] <small>''[[User talk:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#FEBEE8">(Talk |</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#A6DAFC">contribs)</span>]]''</small> 04:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::::Thank you for the further clarification. However, I still don't understand why the table has to be hidden for these reasons - would it not be better to at least show which Pokémon are avaliable and add an incomplete category to the section detailing what's missing? [[User:Jaxon|Jaxon]] ([[User talk:Jaxon|talk]]) 04:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC) | :::::::Thank you for the further clarification. However, I still don't understand why the table has to be hidden for these reasons - would it not be better to at least show which Pokémon are avaliable and add an incomplete category to the section detailing what's missing? [[User:Jaxon|Jaxon]] ([[User talk:Jaxon|talk]]) 04:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::::::I didn't realise until now, but shouldn't the locations be verified as all being in the grass, seeing as the route has no other place to encounter Pokémon? [[User:Jaxon|Jaxon]] ([[User talk:Jaxon|talk]]) 04:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC) | |||