469
edits
Talk:Accuracy: Difference between revisions
→Unclear: new section
No edit summary |
(→Unclear: new section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I just encountered (Pokemon Emerald) a case where a 100% accuracy move, Ice Beam, missed on the first turn of a battle (and thus no modifiers yet). Should I add this glitch onto this page or the glitches page? {{unsigned|Jjl2357}} 8:01pm 6 March 2013 | I just encountered (Pokemon Emerald) a case where a 100% accuracy move, Ice Beam, missed on the first turn of a battle (and thus no modifiers yet). Should I add this glitch onto this page or the glitches page? {{unsigned|Jjl2357}} 8:01pm 6 March 2013 | ||
:It is unlikely to be a glitch. Chances are it was affected by an Ability. Can you provide further information about the situation? --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 04:23, 7 March 2013 (UTC) | :It is unlikely to be a glitch. Chances are it was affected by an Ability. Can you provide further information about the situation? --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 04:23, 7 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Unclear == | |||
This doesn't really seem that clear to me, if a number over 1 always hits, does that mean that it generates a random number from 0 to 1 and if the random number is over the result of the formula then it misses?{{tt|*|I'm guessing that since it can miss one turn and miss the next, but I wanted to be sure before putting it in the article.}} -[[User:IVsaur|<span style="color:lightbrown">EVs</span><small><span style="color:black">and</span></small><span style="color:green">IVsaurs</span>]] 19:59, 26 March 2013 (UTC) | |||