Talk:? (glitch Pokémon): Difference between revisions

(Undo revision 1550803 by Epictwilight901 (talk)please don't reply to old conversations)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
This doesn't even seem to make grammatical sense to me. Furthermore, because ?????????? and ? are vastly different and this one is more similar to ?, the statement "Almost like ??????????" is also incorrect.
This doesn't even seem to make grammatical sense to me. Furthermore, because ?????????? and ? are vastly different and this one is more similar to ?, the statement "Almost like ??????????" is also incorrect.


I highly doubt either of these are real, and will continue to have these doubts unless someone shows me a [[Image:253Unknown.png]] with an eleven-character name and a [[Image:000Unknown.png]] with a twelve-character name.
I highly doubt either of these are real, and will continue to have these doubts unless someone shows me a with an eleven-character name and a with a twelve-character name.


--[[User:DavidJCobb|DavidJCobb]] 23:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
--[[User:DavidJCobb|DavidJCobb]] 23:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Line 35: Line 35:
Can't we split it into smaller pages? -PokemonTrainer7738
Can't we split it into smaller pages? -PokemonTrainer7738
:Sounds good to me. --[[User:Gawaxay|Gawaxay]] 19:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:Sounds good to me. --[[User:Gawaxay|Gawaxay]] 19:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
::But most of them will be stubs.<span style="background:#11FF6C;"><span style="border: 3px solid #A8FF8C;">{{ani|486}}</span></span><span style="background:#00FFFF;">[[User:Pokemaniac102|<span style="color:#A0C0F8;"><sup><big>'''''Poke'''''</big></sup></span>]][[User talk:Pokemaniac102|<span style="color:#A0C0F8;">'''''Maniac'''''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Pokemaniac102|<span style="color:#A0C0F8;"><sub><big>'''''102'''''</big></sub></span>]]</span><span style="background:#11FF6C;"><span style="border: 3px solid #A8FF8C;">{{ani|492}}</span></span> 19:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
::But most of them will be stubs.<span style="background:#11FF6C;"><span style="border: 3px solid #A8FF8C;"></span></span><span style="background:#00FFFF;">[[User:Pokemaniac102|<span style="color:#A0C0F8;"><sup><big>'''''Poke'''''</big></sup></span>]][[User talk:Pokemaniac102|<span style="color:#A0C0F8;">'''''Maniac'''''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Pokemaniac102|<span style="color:#A0C0F8;"><sub><big>'''''102'''''</big></sub></span>]]</span><span style="background:#11FF6C;"><span style="border: 3px solid #A8FF8C;"></span></span> 19:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:::I agree with Pokemaniac. They small pages will be just little stubs, so leave it how it is. --'''[[User:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#FF7F00">Theryguy</span>]][[User talk:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#5C8CFA">5</span>]][[User:Theryguy512/Contribution Page|<span style="color:#5C8CFA">1</span>]][[User:Theryguy512/Similarities|<span style="color:#5C8CFA">2</span>]]''' 23:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:::I agree with Pokemaniac. They small pages will be just little stubs, so leave it how it is. --'''[[User:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#FF7F00">Theryguy</span>]][[User talk:Theryguy512|<span style="color:#5C8CFA">5</span>]][[User:Theryguy512/Contribution Page|<span style="color:#5C8CFA">1</span>]][[User:Theryguy512/Similarities|<span style="color:#5C8CFA">2</span>]]''' 23:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
::::Is [[??????????|this]] a stub? --[[User:Gawaxay|Gawaxay]] 15:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
::::Is [[??????????|this]] a stub? --[[User:Gawaxay|Gawaxay]] 15:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Line 60: Line 60:
Sounds believeable. Probably true. [[User:OwnageMuch|OwnageMuch]] 02:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Sounds believeable. Probably true. [[User:OwnageMuch|OwnageMuch]] 02:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
:It was there before, but removed because it was speculation. Is there anything else to indicate that this is true? --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 04:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
:It was there before, but removed because it was speculation. Is there anything else to indicate that this is true? --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 04:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
== Generation III glitch Pokémon in Colosseum XD ==
What happens if ?, ??????????, or Bad Egg is transferred to Colosseum or XD? --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 14:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
== The evolution makes no sense ==
So, in order to get -, you need to hatch ??. Um... how does that even WORK? Is there a shark code that causes normal Pokemon to hatch? Or, does the game think that ? is an egg?
:I think that (this is speculation based on the properties of certain Pokémon, I haven't poked around in the game's memory) every Pokémon has 2 memory values that both specify whether or not a Pokémon is an egg. Don't ask me why it was designed like that. Since Pokémon has never heard of error catching, if the 2 values are different, 2 scripts that used different "egg" values because "they're both the same, right?" will disagree on whether or not a pokemon is an egg. So a "pokemon" might be able to fight in a battle and level up, because that uses 1 address, but will also hatch, because that uses the other. On the flipside of that, a "pokemon" might not be able to fight, because "it's an egg right?", but it won't hatch because "this is a pokemon, right?". Like how in Generation 1, you can get a pokemon that uses the pikachu sprite because "that's a pikachu!", but it's blue because "that's a lapras!". Again, don't ask me why it's designed like that. I have no idea. Also, like I said, this is just speculation from the properties of glitch pokémon. --[[User:Aaay|<span style="color:blue">Aaay</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Aaay|<span style="color:red">TalK</span>]])''</small> 17:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
56

edits