I don't like being blocked. My latest block log entries:
At, 13:49, 15th January 2020, RobbiRobb (talk | contribs) blocked TrikephaloFan635 (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of 13:49, 15th January 2024 (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Erneuter Regelverstoß: Du wurdest bereits in der Vergangenheit für Regelverstöße gesperrt, wurdest erneut ermahnt und darauf hingewiesen, keine fremden Benutzerseiten zu bearbeiten und doch hast du, obwohl dir bekannt war, dass es Konsequenzen haben wird, erneut eine fremde Benutzerseite bearbeitet) At 21:29, 9th January 2020, Franky7 (talk | contribs) blocked Infernape4All. (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of 3 days (account creation disabled) (Inserting nonsense/gibberish into pages: When you call for Scraggy, it comes this way!) Yes, the time is UTC+1.
If I leave a message on your talk page, go there to respond.
I will be unavailable from 31 January 2020 to 2 February 2020. I will read the messages by using my phone, but I won't respond.
Please stop reverting Yaronos, they are correct. The Egg Group shown should be the Egg Group from whatever generation the move is available in, in this case, since the moves are only available pre-Generation VIII the Egg Groups shown should be their Egg Group before Generation VIII. The same goes to types. The only exception is if the move is available in Generation VIII then it would show the Pokemon's current Egg Group (if it has changed).--ForceFire 04:35, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
I don't think you even read the message. Edit warring was not the point of the message.--ForceFire 09:20, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Talk page archives
Per our talk page policy, when you archive your talk page, you must link back to it from your new talk page. Please add a link to the archive you recently made.
I will add that parts of your talk page are visually fairly busy. I would suggest that adding the link to the gray or white areas near the top of your page would be clearest. Tiddlywinks (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
I will do this tomorrow because I already did 3 User: namespace edits today. That's because of the thing you see to the right. Actually, if you hover at the PKMN menu, you'll see that the Charmeleon icon links to my talk page archive. --TheICTLiker4 19:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Gosh that was a while ago. Nice catch. Thanks for analysing E O, the page is interesting/useful (if no one else finds it, for me at least) even though its in user space.
I unfortunately don't know, other than "this happened when forcing an evolution with the free ball movement feature of the debug menu code" but I can offer the context. Also sorry, I stepped down from emulation, so analysing to machine level now is very hard for me - however, I know how to generate addresses to RAW codes to a supported form; so if there's enough information I can still make a code for a cheating device; all is needed is an address/pointer/offset that the game reads to identify the Pokémon, and analysis.
For the "glitch Pokémon" E O (so far it seems as cheating device only); the only known way is by using the debug mode to evolve Solrock). I'm not very familiar with Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire pinball's data structure to make my own codes to get these in the dex and such too. Regarding people here who may help, it may be good to ask User:Tiddlywinks, who is one of the staff with programming knowledge. Another good bet is User:IIMarckus; he is a busy person and created the Pokémon Red disassembly, though Gen III isn't his forte. User:Metarkrai and User:Bluesun may also know. at the same time.
I'm cautious about creating it because we don't know its index number, nor if the name is consistent. (like with óË e Ái (on GCL I moved it to scrolling beige box) but its index number would match - (glitch Pokémon) (0x019C). Another similar case here, was through "invisible Shiny Bulbasaur" and "DPBox" - both were subtly different but had the same index number; and it depends on your definition of "glitch Pokémon".
Glitches and glitch articles due to their nature, can have systematic subjectiveness and empirical bias (they need to be tested from multiple people), for instance the name "E O" may be from RAM - the short answer "random" the long answer "it depends on this hardware state, or say.. the score could even influence it (like how scientific theories are proven wrong - this is what people in one of the Discord groups I'm in are in are calling "empirical glitching"; it may be E O but the name pointer may not be a consistent source (if you grab binary, then bytes, then character encoding (can be as simple as 01 is A, 02 is B, but it depends on the game) a way to end the sequence you create a structure; it could be a table of names like Bulbasaur, Ivysaur, Venusaur but what if the source of the table is a progress variable like your Pokédex flags?
User:SnorlaxMonster used to be head of glitch here, I'll forward it on to him. As you likely know, there was a point where debate like this was visible; cheating device glitch Pokémon have been deleted, but eventually non-cheating ways to get them were found (and the articles were restored; the ones with clear index numbers, except for things like Bad Egg) (though that one if Generation III counts as the first Bad Egg (debatable) is complex; is the game grabbing -'s sprite? Bad Egg is just the error message?)
OK; these ones probably vary: name, cry, whether any Pokémon becomes it or if it's just a Solrock evolution. From how I gather it, its sprite may be like ??????????; constant (the exception with that is you can get different coloured Decamarks, and I do have a very faint memory someone bypassed the "? in circle" sprite once. So these Pokémon are a class of glitch Pokémon like Pokémon Pinball Ruby and Sapphire "?" sprite glitch Pokémon. If it is like Ruby/Sapphire, documenting them all could take forever; because Generation III Pokémon games have used two bytes for Pokémon, there could be ((2^8)^2) or 65536 of them. The other complication is: what do these glitch Pokémon evolve into rather than Solrock becomes this one? So a glitch Pokémon could evolve into a normal, or another Pokémon. Statistically, it could evolve into one of the 386(?)/65536 valid ones, but would you may find the glitch Pokémon evolving into other glitch Pokémon; another reason why index numbers can be important, and programmers know nothing is truly random with enough information.
Hope this clears some things. Sorry I couldn't answer your question. Chickasaurus (talk) 12:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Please don't create redirects for templates, like you did the previous two times, they are not necessary. Use the proper template names. Thank you.--ForceFire 17:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
You've been told before to not edit other people's comments on talk pages. This includes fixing typos, editing other people's choice links, and outright deleting comments you've judged not to belong. You know it's against our policy, but you continue to do it. You should know better by now: if it's not yours, don't touch it, except to add the unsigned template. But also realize you are better spending your time not trawling for things to add that unsigned template to, when discussions are long over, and those people aren't active anymore. Please reflect on your need to control things that aren't yours to control (again). Kai * the ArcToraph 14:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
I will be sure to not edit any talk page comments of other people after this block ends. Also, see what I have written on Template talk:Red link. TheICTLiker4 14:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)