Page history
16 October 2009
15 October 2009
if you put it that way, it makes it seem that they were released at the same time, which, obviously, is not the case
m−27
no edit summary
m−6
14 October 2009
3 October 2009
30 September 2009
no edit summary
m+14
Undo revision 884323 by Swampert rox (Talk)Yes it does. From Kanto to Johto
m+151
it doesn't.
−151
17 September 2009
DYK that it doesn't matter what the games call them, their names are Gold and Silver D:... no, not really :D
+171
looked weird
+21
no edit summary
m−86
5 August 2009
1 August 2009
28 July 2009
7 July 2009
Typical Missingno. Master list. Tilts too heavily towards stuff the programmers never intended. Lists like this should be a bit more balanced.
m+63
Glitch is not a proper adjective, no matter how much you argue. Echidna has spoken.
'Bout time this got a change, says me.
−260
20 June 2009
19 June 2009
11 June 2009
5 June 2009
no edit summary
m−4
Adding Arceus (TCG) into the page. It didn't exist when I had put these new facts here.
+6
4 June 2009
2 June 2009
28 May 2009
8 May 2009
26 April 2009
18 April 2009
11 April 2009
Whoops...
m+6
Who fails at apostrophe count?
+1
no edit summary
+11
Now's as good a time as any to bring on a new list
m+166
Removing this one. Glitches are not real Pokemon.
−182
10 April 2009
Undo revision 728330 by Theryguy512 (Talk) YES THEY ARE! No regular Pokemon has Normal as a secondary type. And see your talk page.
−7
THEY ARE NOT POKEMON!!!
+7
No, I mean they're the only Pokémon to have it as a secondary type. In fact, as A and PkMn are Normal/Normal, they technically fall under this too.
+40
9 April 2009
30 March 2009
Yes, I agree with the removal of that Mac dictionary fact, but what I don't agree with is the removal of the links below it!
m+168
no edit summary
−5
has no related article, not needed.
−318
no edit summary
+155